The Pakistan (Lahore) cochlear implant programme: issues relating to implantation in a developing country
- PMID: 17445354
- DOI: 10.1017/S0022215107007463
The Pakistan (Lahore) cochlear implant programme: issues relating to implantation in a developing country
Abstract
The Pakistan cochlear implant programme was started in Lahore in August 2000. It was initially established with the technical support of the Manchester cochlear implant team. There are no government resources available for cochlear implantation in Pakistan and the cost of cochlear implantation is met by the candidates and their families. Up till December 2005, 52 individuals have been implanted. Forty-four (84.6 per cent) of these patients were children and eight (15.4 per cent) patients were adults. Congenital deafness (94 per cent) is the main aetiological factor in children. Seventy-six per cent of these children were born to blood related parents. All patients received a Med-El Combi 40+ device. The listening progress profile, the meaningful auditory integration scale and the meaningful use of speech scale were used to assess the auditory performance in children. Thirty-nine children achieved an average listening progress profile score of 37.7 after 12 months of implantation. The overall rate of major and minor complications was 11.5 per cent. Failure rate for the device itself has been 3.8 per cent. In addition to considering these preliminary outcomes and funding issues, the problems of setting up a cochlear implant programme in a developing country are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Auditory performance of cochlear implant children aged 2-5 years.J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Nov;89(11):1923-7. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006. PMID: 17205875
-
Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep;127(9):943-6. doi: 10.1080/00016480601110253. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007. PMID: 17712673
-
Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Dec;69(12):1675-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.05.002. Epub 2005 Jun 13. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 15955572
-
Bilateral cochlear implants should be the standard for children with bilateral sensorineural deafness.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Feb;16(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282f5e97c. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008. PMID: 18197026 Review.
-
Traditional and emerging indications in cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2005;126(4):287-92. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2005. PMID: 16496561 Review.
Cited by
-
Institutional Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Deprived Population.Cureus. 2022 Nov 24;14(11):e31853. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31853. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36579265 Free PMC article.
-
Precochlear Implant Assessment: Clinical Profile and Family History of Children with Severe Bilateral Prelingual Hearing Loss.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;24(4):e457-e461. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402442. Epub 2020 Feb 7. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33101511 Free PMC article.
-
Libyan cochlear implant programme: achievements, difficulties, and future goals.Libyan J Med. 2011;6. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v6i0.5930. Epub 2011 May 30. Libyan J Med. 2011. PMID: 21694783 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation factors of non-communicable disease policies and programmes for children and youth in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jun 3;8(1):e002556. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002556. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024. PMID: 38830723 Free PMC article.
-
Complications of Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Public Implant Centre Experience.Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Sep-Oct;37(5):1519-1523. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.3960. Pak J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34475941 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous