Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Apr;13(2):93-8.
doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.013862.

"Risk Watch": cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating an injury prevention program

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

"Risk Watch": cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating an injury prevention program

Denise Kendrick et al. Inj Prev. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based injury prevention program.

Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 20 primary schools in Nottingham, UK.

Participants: 459 children aged 7 to 10 years.

Intervention: The "Risk Watch" program delivered by teachers, aimed at improving bike and pedestrian, falls, poisoning and fire and burns safety.

Main outcome measures: Safety knowledge, observed safety skills and self-reported safety behaviour.

Results: At follow-up, intervention group children correctly answered more fire and burn prevention knowledge questions than control group children (difference between means 7.0% (95% CI 1.5% to 12.6%)). Children in intervention group schools were more likely to know the correct actions to take if clothes catch fire and the correct way to wear a cycle helmet (difference between school means 35.3% (95% CI 22.7% to 47.9%) and 6.3% (95% CI 1.4% to 11.1%) respectively). They were also more likely to know the correct actions to take in a house fire and on finding tablets (OR 2.80 (95% CI 1.08 to 7.22) and OR 3.50 (95% CI 1.18 to 10.38) respectively) and correctly demonstrated more safety skills than control group children (difference between means 11.9% (95% CI 1.4% to 22.5%)). There was little evidence to suggest the first year of the program impacted on self-reported safety behaviours.

Conclusions: The Risk Watch program delivered by teachers in primary schools increased some aspects of children's safety knowledge and skills and primary schools should consider delivering this program. Longer term, larger scale evaluations are required to examine retention of knowledge and skills and impact on safety behaviours and child injury rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None.

References

    1. Royal S, Kendrick D, Coleman T. Non-legislative interventions for the promotion of cycle helmet wearing by children. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No. : CD003985, DOI: 10. 1002/14651858. CD003985. pub2. 2005 - PubMed
    1. Duperrex O, Bunn F, Roberts I. Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal 20023241129–1133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents The effectiveness of cyclist training. Birmingham: Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, 2001
    1. Liller K D, Craig J, Crane N.et al Evaluation of a poison prevention lesson for kindergarten and third grade students. Injury Prevention 19984218–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oxford Evaluation Team An evaluation of the Lifeskills: learning for living program. HSE Research Report 187. Norwich: HMSO, 2003

Publication types