Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Apr;19(2):86-95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00927.x.

Emergency department personal protective equipment requirements following out-of-hospital chemical biological or radiological events in Australasia

Guy W Sansom  1
Affiliations
Review

Emergency department personal protective equipment requirements following out-of-hospital chemical biological or radiological events in Australasia

Guy W Sansom. Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Recent events have led to a revision in ED equipment, preparedness and training for disasters. However, clinicians must still decide when, and what level of personal protection is required when a toxic threat exists. If possible, clear, simple and achievable protocols are required in such situations. Following an off-site Australasian chemical biological or radiological incident, current evidence indicates that the initial receiving ED staff will be adequately protected from all known chemical biological and radiological inhalational threats by wearing a properly fitted P2 (N95) mask, or its equivalent. Protection from serious contact injury is offered by wearing double gloves, disposable fluid-repellent coveralls or gown, eye protection, surgical mask, and ideally, a cap and shoe covers; in conjunction with universal precautions and procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of P2 and N95 masks.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. Policy document: emergency department hazardous material response plan: staff participation. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2004; 16: 177. - PubMed
    1. Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, Cisek K. Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1999; 34: 205–12. - PubMed
    1. Okumura T, Suzuki K, Fukuda A et al. The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 2: hospital response. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1998; 5: 618–24. - PubMed
    1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Medical Preparedness for Terrorism and Other Disasters. Chicago: American Medical Association, June 2000. Available from URL: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/14313.html[Accessed 12 August 2006].
    1. Hick JL. Protective equipment for health care facility decontamination personnel: regulations, risks, and recommendations. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2003; 42: 370–80. - PubMed