Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;64(9):616-25.
doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.031005. Epub 2007 Apr 20.

Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response

Affiliations

Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response

Misty J Hein et al. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: This report provides an update of the mortality experience of a cohort of South Carolina asbestos textile workers.

Methods: A cohort of 3072 workers exposed to chrysotile in a South Carolina asbestos textile plant (1916-77) was followed up for mortality through 2001. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed using US and South Carolina mortality rates. A job exposure matrix provided calendar time dependent estimates of chrysotile exposure concentrations. Poisson regression models were fitted for lung cancer and asbestosis. Covariates considered included sex, race, age, calendar time, birth cohort and time since first exposure. Cumulative exposure lags of 5 and 10 years were considered by disregarding exposure in the most recent 5 and 10 years, respectively.

Results: A majority of the cohort was deceased (64%) and 702 of the 1961 deaths occurred since the previous update. Mortality was elevated based on US referent rates for a priori causes of interest including all causes combined (SMR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.39); all cancers (SMR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.39); oesophageal cancer (SMR 1.87, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.99); lung cancer (SMR 1.95, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.24); ischaemic heart disease (SMR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.32); and pneumoconiosis and other respiratory diseases (SMR 4.81, 95% CI 3.84 to 5.94). Mortality remained elevated for these causes when South Carolina referent rates were used. Three cases of mesothelioma were observed among cohort members. Exposure-response modelling for lung cancer, using a linear relative risk model, produced a slope coefficient of 0.0198 (fibre-years/ml) (standard error 0.00496), when cumulative exposure was lagged 10 years. Poisson regression modelling confirmed significant positive relations between estimated chrysotile exposure and lung cancer and asbestosis mortality observed in previous updates of this cohort.

Conclusions: This study confirms the findings from previous investigations of excess mortality from lung cancer and asbestosis and a strong exposure-response relation between estimated exposure to chrysotile and mortality from lung cancer and asbestosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. McDonald J C, McDonald A D. Chrysotile, tremolite and carcinogenicity. Ann Occup Hyg 199741699–705. - PubMed
    1. Stayner L T, Dankovic D A, Lemen R A. Occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and cancer risk: a review of the amphibole hypothesis. Am J Public Health 199686179–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landrigan P J, Nicholson W J, Suzuki Y.et al The hazards of chrysotile asbestos: a critical review. Ind Health 199937271–280. - PubMed
    1. Yano E, Wang Z, Wang X.et al Cancer mortality among workers exposed to amphibole‐free chrysotile asbestos. Am J Epidemiol 2001154538–543. - PubMed
    1. Dement J M, Harris R L, Jr, Symons M J.et al Exposures and mortality among chrysotile asbestos workers. Part II: Mortality. Am J Ind Med 19834421–433. - PubMed

Substances