This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 2007 May;64(5):353-8, 303.

doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.031153.

How to undertake a systematic review in an occupational setting

P J Nicholson¹

Affiliations

PMID: 17449568
PMCID: PMC2092548
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.031153

How to undertake a systematic review in an occupational setting

P J Nicholson. Occup Environ Med. 2007 May.

. 2007 May;64(5):353-8, 303.

doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.031153.

Author

P J Nicholson¹

Affiliation

¹ Occupational Health, Procter & Gamble, Whitehall Lane, Egham, Surrey TW20 9NW, UK. nicholson.pj@pg.com

PMID: 17449568
PMCID: PMC2092548
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.031153

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

[Evidence-based medicine as a fundamental principle of health care management for workers].
Amirov NKh, Fatkhutdinova LM. Amirov NKh, et al. Med Tr Prom Ekol. 2011;(9):1-5. Med Tr Prom Ekol. 2011. PMID: 22164991 Russian.
[Methodology of occupational fitness examination: problems and ways to solutions].
Karulina OA, Boiko IV. Karulina OA, et al. Med Tr Prom Ekol. 2013;(12):12-6. Med Tr Prom Ekol. 2013. PMID: 24745177 Russian.
Evidence-based medicine for occupational health.
Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ, Malmivaara A, Hulshof CT, Räsänen K, Kankaanpää EE, Mukala K. Verbeek JH, et al. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Jun;28(3):197-204. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002. PMID: 12109560
Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review.
Schlosser RW, Wendt O, Bhavnani S, Nail-Chiwetalu B. Schlosser RW, et al. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;41(5):567-82. doi: 10.1080/13682820600742190. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006. PMID: 17050471 Review.
Searching for studies for inclusion in Cochrane Systematic Reviews on injury prevention.
Blackhall K, Ker K. Blackhall K, et al. Inj Prev. 2008 Apr;14(2):137-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.018556. Inj Prev. 2008. PMID: 18388237 Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Prevention of occupational asthma.
Tarlo SM, Liss GM. Tarlo SM, et al. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010 Jul;10(4):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s11882-010-0118-y. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010. PMID: 20424999 Review.
We're only in it for the knowledge? A problem solving turn in environment and health expert elicitation.
Keune H, Gutleb AC, Zimmer KE, Ravnum S, Yang A, Bartonova A, Krayer von Krauss M, Ropstad E, Eriksen GS, Saunders M, Magnanti B, Forsberg B. Keune H, et al. Environ Health. 2012 Jun 28;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S3. Environ Health. 2012. PMID: 22759503 Free PMC article.
Priority-setting tools for rheumatology disease referrals: a review of the literature.
De Coster C, Fitzgerald A, Cepoiu M; Investigators of the Western Canada Waiting List Project (WCWL). De Coster C, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Nov;27(11):1411-6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0938-5. Epub 2008 Jun 17. Clin Rheumatol. 2008. PMID: 18560920

References

1. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument The AGREE Collaboration. London: 2001, http://www.agreecollaboration.org (accessed 22 Feb 2007) This instrument provides a validated, internationally agreed framework for assessing the quality of clinical practice guideline development in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability and editorial independence.
1. Green S, Higgins J. eds. Logistics of doing a review. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 4.2.6. (updated September 2006). Section 2.3. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/Handbook4.2.6Sep2006.pdf (accessed 5 March 2007) This resource provides practical guidance on the review team, consumer involvement, advisory groups, resources, training and seeking funding.
1. Good research practice. Medical Research Council. London: MRC, 2000, Updated version September 2005. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d = MRC002415 (accessed 5 March 2007)
1. General Medical Council Research: the role and responsibilities of doctors. London: GMC, 2002. http://www.gmc‐uk.org/guidance/current/library/research.asp (accessed 6 October 2006)
1. Lyratzopoulos G, Allen D. How to manage your research and audit work. BMJ Career Focus 2004328196–197.

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources