How to undertake a systematic review in an occupational setting
- PMID: 17449568
- PMCID: PMC2092548
- DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.031153
How to undertake a systematic review in an occupational setting
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument The AGREE Collaboration. London: 2001, http://www.agreecollaboration.org (accessed 22 Feb 2007) This instrument provides a validated, internationally agreed framework for assessing the quality of clinical practice guideline development in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability and editorial independence.
-
- Green S, Higgins J. eds. Logistics of doing a review. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 4.2.6. (updated September 2006). Section 2.3. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/Handbook4.2.6Sep2006.pdf (accessed 5 March 2007) This resource provides practical guidance on the review team, consumer involvement, advisory groups, resources, training and seeking funding.
-
- Good research practice. Medical Research Council. London: MRC, 2000, Updated version September 2005. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d = MRC002415 (accessed 5 March 2007)
-
- General Medical Council Research: the role and responsibilities of doctors. London: GMC, 2002. http://www.gmc‐uk.org/guidance/current/library/research.asp (accessed 6 October 2006)
-
- Lyratzopoulos G, Allen D. How to manage your research and audit work. BMJ Career Focus 2004328196–197.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources