Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?
- PMID: 17449851
- PMCID: PMC2675319
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.109439
Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?
Abstract
Perspective on the paper by Cooke (see page F189)
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: none.
Comment on
- 
  
  Conventional birth weight standards obscure fetal growth restriction in preterm infants.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 May;92(3):F189-92. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.089698. Epub 2006 Mar 17. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007. PMID: 16547077 Free PMC article.
References
- 
    - Battaglia F C, Lubchenco L O. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr 196771159–163. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Lubchenco L O, Hansman C, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics 196637403–408. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Usher R, McLean F. Intrauterine growth of live‐born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr 196974901–910. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Brenner W E, Edelman D A, Hendricks C H. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976126555–564. - PubMed
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        