Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 May;24(5):348-52.
doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.044677.

Cardiac monitoring of high-risk patients after an electrical injury: a prospective multicentre study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Cardiac monitoring of high-risk patients after an electrical injury: a prospective multicentre study

Benoit Bailey et al. Emerg Med J. 2007 May.

Erratum in

  • Emerg Med J. 2007 Aug;24(8):605

Abstract

Objective: To report our experience monitoring patients with previously identified theoretical risk factors of significant electrical injury.

Methods: Patients who presented to one of 21 emergency departments between October 2000 and November 2004 were eligible to be enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study if after an electric shock they had one of several risk factors (transthoracic current, tetany, loss of consciousness or voltage source > or =1000 V) and therefore needed cardiac monitoring.

Results: Of the 134 patients enrolled, most were monitored because of transthoracic current (n = 60), transthoracic current and tetany (n = 39), tetany (n = 10), or voltage > or =1000 V (n = 10). There were 15/134 (11%) patients with abnormal initial ECGs. No patient developed potentially lethal late arrhythmia during the 24 hours of cardiac monitoring.

Conclusion: Although only patients deemed at risk of late arrhythmias were monitored, none developed potentially lethal late arrhythmias. Asymptomatic patients with transthoracic current and/or tetany and a normal initial ECG do not require cardiac monitoring after an electrical injury with voltage <1000 V and no loss of consciousness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fontanarosa P B. Electric shock and lighting strike. Ann Emerg Med 199322378–387. - PubMed
    1. Koumbourlis A C. Electrical injuries. Crit Care Med 200230S424–S430. - PubMed
    1. Purdue G F, Hunt J L. Electrocardiographic monitoring after electrical injury: necessity or luxury? J Trauma 198626166–167. - PubMed
    1. Wrobel N. Spate Herzhythmusstorungen nach stromunfall? Deutsch Med Wochenschr 19881131554–1556. - PubMed
    1. Moran K T, Munster A M. Low voltage electrical injuries: The hidden morbidity. J Roy Coll Surg Edinb 198631227–228. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances