Automatic control of tracheal tube cuff pressure in ventilated patients in semirecumbent position: a randomized trial
- PMID: 17452937
- DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266686.95843.7D
Automatic control of tracheal tube cuff pressure in ventilated patients in semirecumbent position: a randomized trial
Abstract
Objective: The aspiration of subglottic secretions colonized by bacteria pooled around the tracheal tube cuff due to inadvertent deflation (<20 cm H2O) of the cuff plays a relevant role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We assessed the efficacy of an automatic, validated device for the continuous regulation of tracheal tube cuff pressure in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Respiratory intensive care unit and general medical intensive care unit.
Patients: One hundred and forty-two mechanically ventilated patients (age, 64 +/- 17 yrs; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 18 +/- 6) without pneumonia or aspiration at admission.
Interventions: Within 24 hrs of intubation, patients were randomly allocated to undergo continuous regulation of the cuff pressure with the automatic device (n = 73) or routine care of the cuff pressure (control group, n = 69). Patients remained in a semirecumbent position in bed.
Measurements and main results: The primary end point variable was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Main causes for intubation were decreased consciousness (43, 30%) and exacerbation of chronic respiratory diseases (38, 27%). Cuff pressure <20 cm H2O was more frequently observed in the control than the automatic group (45.3 vs. 0.7% determinations, p < .001). However, the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia with clinical criteria (16, 22% vs. 20, 29%) and microbiological confirmation (11, 15% vs. 10, 15%), the distribution of early and late onset, the causative microorganisms, and intensive care unit (20, 27% vs. 16, 23%) and hospital mortality (30, 41% vs. 23, 33%) were similar for the automatic and control groups, respectively.
Conclusions: Cuff pressure is better controlled with the automatic device. However, it did not result in additional benefits to the semirecumbent position in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Comment in
-
Endotracheal tube cuff leak: can optimum management of cuff pressure prevent pneumonia?Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1624-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000267654.98551.B3. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17522541 No abstract available.
-
Continuous cuff pressure control and the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):2470-1; author reply 2471. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000284746.70372.42. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17885409 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
