Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Feb;43(2):104-7.

[The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 17459238
Randomized Controlled Trial

[The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification]

[Article in Chinese]
Ming Xu et al. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification.

Methods: A total of 54 eyes from 32 patients undergoing phacoemulsification received intraocular lens based on the principle of voluntary. Twenty-four eyes from 13 patients [16 eyes from 8 male participants and 8 eyes from 5 female participants, mean age (60.5 +/- 6.3) years] who had implantation of 1CU accommodative intraocular lens were randomized into experimental group. Thirty eyes from 19 patients [18 eyes from 11 male participants and 12 eyes from 8 female participants, mean age (61 +/- 6) years] who had implantation of Array multifocal intraocular lens were randomized into control group. All participants were age related cataract patients. Main outcome measures include best corrected distance visual acuity, distance corrected near vision, near point, the accommodation amplitude and stereopsis. All the clinical data were obtained at 3 months postoperatively and analyzed of covariance after controlling the factor of age.

Results: (1) At 3 months postoperatively, all 1CU lens maintained good centricity. No patients with 1CU had undergone fibrosis, conglutination and remarkable posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Patients who received Array multifocal intraocular lens had not undergone other complications. (2) At 3 months postoperatively, best-corrected distance visual acuity were similar between the 1CU group and Array group (4.96 +/- 0.15 versus 5.02 +/- 0.08, P = 0.085). (3) Distance corrected near vision were similar between the two groups (4.65 +/- 0.15 versus 4.60 +/- 0.10, P = 0.398). (4) Subjective near point were similar between the two groups [(56 +/- 9) cm versus (61 +/- 11) cm, F = 0.065, P = 0.80]. (5) The accommodation amplitude were similar between the two groups [(1.30 +/- 0.40) D versus (1.20 +/- 0.36) D, P = 0.093]. (6) Patients with a accommodative intraocular lens achieved significantly better stereopsis than patients with multifocal Intraocular lens (43.24'' +/- 18.25'' versus 60.00'' +/- 23.09, P = 0.543).

Conclusions: Patients who received 1CU accommodative Intraocular lens demonstrated partial near vision when kept best distance vision. Our research found no significant difference between two groups in corrected distance vision acuity, distance corrected near vision, subjective near point, accommodation amplitude and near vision corrected stereopsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types