Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land-use management
- PMID: 17459458
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.023
Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land-use management
Abstract
This paper reviews our current knowledge and understanding of carbon processes in the terrestrial ecosystem with a view to reducing soil carbon losses by optimising land-use and land management. Processes that influence the fate of carbon (in both terms of quantity and quality) are important in determining soil fertility, quality and health as well as consequences for future environmental change scenarios. We need to understand the processes that determine soil carbon losses and the fate of the carbon once lost from the soil in order to provide sustainable solutions for mitigating these carbon losses as part of land management "best practice" and balancing national carbon budgets. Here we review the amount of carbon within the UK terrestrial pool, the processes involved and factors influencing carbon transport to and from soils, the fate of the carbon once it has been lost from the soil environment and land-use scenarios that affect carbon losses. We conclude with possible management options to reduce soil carbon loss and identify gaps in knowledge in order to better understand carbon processes in the terrestrial environment.
Similar articles
-
Ecosystem carbon budgeting and soil carbon sequestration in reclaimed mine soil.Environ Int. 2006 Aug;32(6):781-96. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jun 21. Environ Int. 2006. PMID: 16797072 Review.
-
Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978-2003.Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):245-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04038. Nature. 2005. PMID: 16148931
-
Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration.Science. 2005 Dec 23;310(5756):1944-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1119282. Science. 2005. PMID: 16373572
-
Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks.ISME J. 2008 Aug;2(8):805-14. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.58. Epub 2008 Jul 10. ISME J. 2008. PMID: 18615117 Review.
-
Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States.J Environ Qual. 2006 Jul 6;35(4):1566-75. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0215. Print 2006 Jul-Aug. J Environ Qual. 2006. PMID: 16825477
Cited by
-
Global variation in soil carbon sequestration potential through improved cropland management.Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Feb;28(3):1162-1177. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15954. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Glob Chang Biol. 2022. PMID: 34726814 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid carbon accumulation at a saltmarsh restored by managed realignment exceeded carbon emitted in direct site construction.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0259033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259033. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36449465 Free PMC article.
-
Emissions of methane from northern peatlands: a review of management impacts and implications for future management options.Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 13;6(19):7080-7102. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2469. eCollection 2016 Oct. Ecol Evol. 2016. PMID: 28725384 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of the redistribution of soil carbon using a new index--a case study in the Haihe River Basin, North China.Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Nov;186(11):8023-36. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3985-1. Epub 2014 Aug 5. Environ Monit Assess. 2014. PMID: 25092139
-
Active and passive soil organic carbon pools as affected by different land use types in Mizoram, Northeast India.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0219969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219969. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31361769 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources