Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy
- PMID: 17459573
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.029
Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy
Abstract
Objectives: The impact and outcome of holmium:YAG-laser (Ho:YAG) ureterolithotripsy in treating proximal and distal ureteral stones was investigated.
Methods: A total of 543 patients harbouring proximal (n=194) or distal (n=349) ureteral stones underwent semirigid Ho:YAG ureterolithotripsy. The degree of hydronephrosis; stone size, location, impaction, and composition; and complication and stone-free rates were recorded.
Results: Mean stone size for proximal and distal stones was 7.1+/-3.6 mm and 6.2+/-2.5 mm, respectively. The stone-free rate on the first postoperative day was 79.4% for proximal and 96.8% for distal stones (p<0.0001). For proximal stones <10mm and > or =10mm, respectively, the stone-free rate was 80.5% and 74.3% (p=0.4) and for distal stones 97.3% and 94.3% (p=0.2). Stone-free rates for radio-opaque versus radiolucent stones in proximal stones were 79.6% versus 77.9% (p=0.8) and 97.6% versus 96.2% in distal stones (p=0.5). Impaction correlated significantly with stone-free rates (p<0.0001). Stone-free rates for nonimpacted versus impacted proximal stones were 85.8% versus 67.2% (p=0.003) and for distal stones 99.2% versus 91.4% (p<0.003), respectively. The presence or degree of hydronephrosis did not correlate with treatment success (p=0.4, p=0.8). The presence of intraoperative complications correlated significantly with proximal compared to distal ureteral stone location (p=0.004). Auxiliary measures in proximal versus distal stones were performed in 20.6% versus 2.9% (p<0.0001).
Conclusions: In this series, stone-free rates in Ho:YAG ureterolithotripsy were significantly higher in distal and nonimpacted stones but were independent of stone size and composition and the degree of hydronephrosis. Ureterolithotripsy in proximal stones was associated with higher intraoperative complication and retreatment rates compared to distal stones.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment on: impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1757-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.030. Epub 2007 Oct 24. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17459571 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment on: Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1758-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.031. Epub 2007 Oct 24. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17459572 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Editorial comment on: impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1757-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.030. Epub 2007 Oct 24. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17459571 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment on: Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1758-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.031. Epub 2007 Oct 24. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17459572 No abstract available.
-
Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17382137
-
Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature.Urol Int. 2009;82(3):356-60. doi: 10.1159/000209372. Epub 2009 May 11. Urol Int. 2009. PMID: 19440028 Review.
-
Management of ureteric stones.Eur Urol. 2004 Jun;45(6):714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.018. Eur Urol. 2004. PMID: 15149742 Review.
Cited by
-
External Validation of the S.T.O.N.E. Score in Predicting Stone-Free Status After Rigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.Res Rep Urol. 2021 Mar 23;13:147-154. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S304221. eCollection 2021. Res Rep Urol. 2021. PMID: 33791248 Free PMC article.
-
How has the COVID-19 pandemic changed treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones?Curr Urol. 2024 Mar;18(1):66-70. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000143. Epub 2023 Nov 12. Curr Urol. 2024. PMID: 38505151 Free PMC article.
-
Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171478. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28182718 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones.World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1497-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2028-2. Epub 2017 Mar 20. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28321499 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of NCCT quantitative analysis for proximal and middle impacted ureteral stones.Urolithiasis. 2024 Aug 23;52(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01616-w. Urolithiasis. 2024. PMID: 39174805
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources