Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May 1;104(18):7688-92.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702018104. Epub 2007 Apr 25.

KSper, a pH-sensitive K+ current that controls sperm membrane potential

Affiliations

KSper, a pH-sensitive K+ current that controls sperm membrane potential

Betsy Navarro et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Mature mammalian spermatozoa are quiescent in the male reproductive tract. Upon ejaculation and during their transit through the female reproductive tract, they undergo changes that enable them to fertilize the egg. During this process of capacitation, they acquire progressive motility, develop hyperactivated motility, and are readied for the acrosome reaction. All of these processes are regulated by intracellular pH. In the female reproductive tract, the spermatozoan cytoplasm alkalinizes, which in turn activates a Ca2+-selective current (I(CatSper)) required for hyperactivated motility. Here, we show that alkalinization also has a dramatic effect on membrane potential, producing a rapid hyperpolarization. This hyperpolarization is primarily mediated by a weakly outwardly rectifying K+ current (I(KSper)) originating from the principal piece of the sperm flagellum. Alkalinization activates the pH(i)-sensitive I(KSper), setting the membrane potential to negative potentials where Ca2+ entry via I(CatSper) is maximized. I(KSper) is one of two dominant ion currents of capacitated sperm cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
pHi sets the murine spermatozoan resting membrane potential. (a) Spermatozoan in whole-cell patch-clamp configuration. The pipette contains 1 mM Lucifer yellow, which fills the cytoplasmic space (Lower). Differential interference contrast image (Upper). (Scale bar, 10 μm.) (b) WT spermatozoan resting membrane potential (pHi 6.0) before and after induction of intracellular alkalinization by bath perfusion with 5 mM NH4Cl. Reduction of extracellular Cl ions, or the addition of 25 μM amiloride (ENaC channel antagonist), did not block the alkalinization-induced hyperpolarization. Representative of three similar recordings is shown. (c) WT IKSper at pHi 6.0 before (red) and after (black) addition of 5 mM NH4Cl in normal saline (HS) or low Cl solution (green). The dashed line indicates 0 current level. Also shown is the voltage-clamp ramp protocol from −100 to +100 mV [1 sec; holding potential (HP), 0 mV]. (d) Mean membrane potential in varying pHi. Alkalinization dramatically shifts the spermatozoan's resting membrane potential (averaged data from experiments similar to a).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Endogenous sperm cell K+ current (IKSper). (a) Weakly outwardly rectifying K+ current from a WT spermatozoan measured in symmetrical 160 mM [K+] (pHi 8.0) in response to a 1-sec ramp protocol from −100 to +100 mV [holding potential (HP), 0 mV]. (b) IKSper of CatSper1−/− spermatozoa in response to voltage steps. Whole-cell currents elicited by 1-sec steps from HP of 0 mV to test potentials between −100 and +100 mV (Δ = +20 mV; 5-sec intervals; pHi 8.0). (c) Reversal potentials of a CatSper1−/− spermatozoan were measured in response to changing [K+]o (pHi 8.0) from 160 mM (black trace; Erev = 1.2 ± 0.34 mV; n = 30) to 5 mM (red trace; Erev = −72.5 ± 0.71 mV; n = 21; predicted EK = −87 mV). Green trace, 0 mM [K+]o. (d) Head plus midpiece sperm fragment loaded with Lucifer yellow dye (Lower). Differential interference contrast (DIC) image (Upper). (Scale bar, 10 μm.) (e) Midpiece + principal piece sperm fragment loaded with Lucifer yellow dye (Lower). DIC image (Upper). (Scale bar, 10 μm.) (f) Current in CatSper1−/− spermatozoa in response to a 1-sec voltage-clamp ramp from −100 to +100 mV from the head + midpiece (red) and from the midpiece + principal piece (black; pHi 8.0).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Intracellular alkalinization strongly potentiates IKSper. (a) Steady-state whole-cell currents of CatSper1−/− spermatozoa at pHi 6.0 (red), 7.0 (blue), and 8.0 (black). (b) Initial current (red) of CatSper1−/− spermatozoa in symmetrical 160 mM [K+] at pHi 6.0. Addition of 5 mM NH4Cl to the bath alkalinized the cytoplasm and induced IKSper (black). Alkalinization-induced IKSper in 5 mM (purple) or 80 mM (green) [K+]o. (c) Average IKSper amplitudes at −100 and +100 mV at varying pHi. HP, holding potential.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
IKSper antagonists and their effects on sperm membrane potential. (a) IKSper antagonist effect on CatSper1−/− spermatozoa (symmetrical 160 mM [K+] at pHi 7.5, +100mV). (b) Spermatozoan membrane potential (WT; pHi 7.0) was reversibly depolarized by 500 μM quinine but irreversibly depolarized by 50 μM clofilium (washout, 15 min). Addition of 5 mM NH4Cl had a small effect on membrane potential. A representative trace from four independent experiments is shown. (c) Bath perfusion with 2 mM BaCl2, 5 μM mibefradil, and 50 μM EIPA reversibly depolarized the WT sperm cell membrane potential (pHi 7.0). A representative trace from four independent experiments is shown. (d) EIPA (50 μM) blocked WT sperm hyperpolarization induced by 1 mM NH4Cl or 4 mM 4-AP (pHi 6.0). Amiloride (25 μM) had no effect on Vm. A representative trace from three independent experiments is shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yanagimachi R. In: The Physiology of Reproduction. Knobile E, Neill JD, editors. New York: Raven; 1994. pp. 189–317.
    1. Zeng Y, Oberdorf JA, Florman HM. Dev Biol. 1996;173:510–520. - PubMed
    1. Demarco IA, Espinosa F, Edwards J, Sosnik J, De La Vega-Beltran JL, Hockensmith JW, Kopf GS, Darszon A, Visconti PE. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7001–7009. - PubMed
    1. Zeng Y, Clark EN, Florman HM. Dev Biol. 1995;171:554–563. - PubMed
    1. Babcock DF. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:6380–6389. - PubMed

Publication types