Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Mar 14;13(10):1505-15.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i10.1505.

Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer

Yasuji Seyama et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Since extrahepatic bile duct cancer is difficult to diagnose and to cure, a safe and radical surgical strategy is needed. In this review, the modes of infiltration and spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and surgical strategy are discussed. Extended hemihepatectomy, with or without pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), plus extrahepatic bile duct resection and regional lymphadenectomy has recently been recognized as the standard curative treatment for hilar bile duct cancer. On the other hand, PD is the choice of treatment for middle and distal bile duct cancer. Major hepatectomy concomitant with PD (hepatopancreatoduodenectomy) has been applied to selected patients with widespread tumors. Preoperative biliary drainage (BD) followed by portal vein embolization (PVE) enables major hepatectomy in patients with hilar bile duct cancer without mortality. BD should be performed considering the surgical procedure, especially, in patients with separated intrahepatic bile ducts caused by hilar bile duct cancer. Right or left trisectoriectomy are indicated according to the tumor spread and biliary anatomy. As a result, extended radical resection offers a chance for cure of hilar bile duct cancer with improved resectability, curability, and a 5-year survival rate of 40%. A 5-year survival rate has ranged from 24% to 39% after PD for middle and distal bile duct cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema of extrahepatic bile duct.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bismuth-Corlette classification of hilar bile duct cancer[9].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Tumor infiltration of the roots of the caudate branches; A: Cholangiography of a resected specimen. Hilar bile duct cancer has infiltrated the root of the caudate branches (B1) arising from the confluence of the hepatic duct (arrows); B: Gross appearance of the resected tumor. The caudate branch opens into the hilar neoplasm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart of preoperative treatment. If a patient had jaundice or there were dilated bile ducts in the future remnant liver, biliary drainage (BD) was performed. Surgical interventions were scheduled after sufficient recovery of hepatic function. Portal vein embolization (PVE) was carried out to avoid postoperative liver failure, depending on the liver function and the liver volume to be resected.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Intraoperative view at laparotomy after biliary drainage and portal vein embolization. A percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tube (arrow) has been inserted into the bile duct of segment 3. The right liver is markedly atrophic, and there is a clear line of demarcation between the right and left liver.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Indications for left trisectoriectomy according to tumor location and the bile duct variations in the anatomy of the right lateral branch of the bile duct. Double lines indicate the scheduled cut end of the bile duct. Type A, ordinary bifurcation; extended right hepatectomy is the choice of treatment. Type B, the right lateral branch originates from the common hepatic duct; left trisectoriectomy, preserving the right lateral branch, is a useful alternative in Types B1 and B2. Type C, the right lateral branch originates from the left hepatic duct; left trisectoriectomy may provide a longer bile duct margin.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Cholangiography of the resected specimen by HPD. The tumor is located in the common hepatic duct (Bismuth-Corllete type 2), and microscopic examination showed superficial spread to the right and left hepatic duct and the intrapancreatic part of the common bile duct (arrows).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Graph of data from a literature review of the relationship between curative resection and major hepatectomy rate. The studies are listed shown in Table 1. Curative resection is defined as a microscopic ally negative margin. Linear approximation showed a significant correlation between the rate of major hepatectomy and curative resection (P = 0.0027, R = 0.7).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Graph of data from a literature review of the relationship between the preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) and the rate of postoperative liver failure after major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer. PVE significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative liver failure (P = 0.0113).

References

    1. Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med. 1965;38:241–256. - PubMed
    1. Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;140:170–178. - PubMed
    1. Launois B, Campion JP, Brissot P, Gosselin M. Carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. Surgical management and the case for resection. Ann Surg. 1979;190:151–157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tompkins RK, Thomas D, Wile A, Longmire WP. Prognostic factors in bile duct carcinoma: analysis of 96 cases. Ann Surg. 1981;194:447–457. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumgart LH, Hadjis NS, Benjamin IS, Beazley R. Surgical approaches to cholangiocarcinoma at confluence of hepatic ducts. Lancet. 1984;1:66–70. - PubMed