Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005;26(1):1-18.
doi: 10.1002/imhj.20033.

DIFFERENTIAL ATTACHMENT RESPONSES OF MALE AND FEMALE INFANTS TO FRIGHTENING MATERNAL BEHAVIOR: TEND OR BEFRIEND VERSUS FIGHT OR FLIGHT?

Daryn H David  1 , Karlen Lyons-Ruth
Affiliations

DIFFERENTIAL ATTACHMENT RESPONSES OF MALE AND FEMALE INFANTS TO FRIGHTENING MATERNAL BEHAVIOR: TEND OR BEFRIEND VERSUS FIGHT OR FLIGHT?

Daryn H David et al. Infant Ment Health J. 2005.

Abstract

Taylor and colleagues (2000) proposed that males tend to display fight or flight responses to threat while females are more likely to display affiliative "tend or befriend" responses. In light of this hypothesis, gender differences in infant attachment behaviors were examined in a sample of 65 low-income mother-infant dyads, half of whom were referred to a home-based intervention service because of concerns about the quality of caregiving. Attachment behaviors were assessed in the Ainsworth Strange Situation when infants were 18 months old, and maternal behaviors were coded both for frightened or frightening behaviors, using the Main and Hesse (1992) coding inventory, and for disrupted affective communication using the Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification assessment tool (AMBIANCE; Lyons-Ruth, Bronfman, & Parsons, 1999). Results indicated that as maternal behavior became more frightening, female infants tended to approach their mothers more than male infants. These gender differences in response to maternal frightening behavior also were evident in the clinically referred subsample. The results suggest that gender-based differences in tendencies to show affiliative behaviors to threat may complicate interpretation of attachment behavior in clinical contexts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Maternal frightening behavior, infant gender, and attachment behavior.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maternal frightening behavior, infant gender, and infant attachment behavior: Clinically referred families only.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Maternal withdrawing behavior, infant gender, and infant attachment behaviors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Maternal withdrawing behavior, infant gender, and infant attachment behaviors: Clinically referred families.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ainsworth MDS, Blehar M, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of attachment. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1978.
    1. Bronfman E, Parsons E, Lyons-Ruth K. Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification (AMBIANCE): Manual for coding disrupted affective communication. Department of Psychiatry; Cambridge Hospital, 1493 Cambridge St., Cambridge, MA 02139: 1993. Unpublished. Available from K. Lyons-Ruth.
    1. Carlson V, Cicchetti D, Barnett D, Braunwald K. Disorganized/disoriented attachment relationships in maltreated infants. Developmental Psychology. 1989;25:525–531.
    1. Connell DB. Individual differences in attachment: An investigation into stability, implications, and relationships to structure of early language development. Syracuse University; Syracuse, NY: 1976. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
    1. Crittenden PM. Attachment and psychopathology. In: Goldberg S, Muir R, Kerr J, editors. Attachment theory: Social, developmental, and clinical perspectives. Analytic Press; Hillsdale, NJ: 1995. pp. 367–406.

LinkOut - more resources