Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;35(1):27-35.
doi: 10.3758/bf03196071.

Interactions between retroactive-interference and context-mediated treatments that impair pavlovian conditioned responding

Affiliations

Interactions between retroactive-interference and context-mediated treatments that impair pavlovian conditioned responding

Daniel S Wheeler et al. Learn Behav. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

In Pavlovian fear conditioning, context-mediated decrements in conditioned responding (e.g., the US preexposure effect) can counteract competition between cues trained together (e.g., overshadowing). Two experiments were conducted using rats in a conditioned lick suppression preparation to determine whether context-mediated competition also counteracts competition between c ues trained separately (retroactive interference, or RI). In Experiment 1, a combination of degraded contingency and RI treatments produced less of a decrement in conditioned responding than did either of those treatments alone. Experiment 2 showed that RI treatment attenuates the normally deleterious effect of trial massing. The results suggest that empirical similarities are shared by interference between cues trained apart and competition between cues trained together.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experiment 1. The bars depict the mean suppression scores for the four groups. Larger bars denote longer latencies to resume drinking in the presence of the CS. Thus, smaller bars suggest less fear to the target stimulus. The error bars represent the standard error for each group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experiment 2. The bars depict the mean suppression scores for the four groups. Larger bars denote longer latencies to resume drinking in the presence of the CS. Thus, smaller bars suggest less fear to the target stimulus. The error bars represent the standard error for each group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson MC, Bjork EL, Bjork RA. Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2000;7:522–530. - PubMed
    1. Barela PB. Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 1999;25:177–193. - PubMed
    1. Blaisdell AP, Bristol AS, Gunther LM, Miller RR. Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: Support for the comparator hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 1998;24:335–351. - PubMed
    1. Denniston JC, Savastano HI, Miller RR. The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In: Mower R, Klein S, editors. Handbook of contemporary learning theories. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001. pp. 65–117.
    1. Dickinson A, Burke J. Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1996;49B:60–80. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources