Does the triple P-Positive Parenting Program provide value for money?
- PMID: 17464705
- DOI: 10.1080/00048670601172723
Does the triple P-Positive Parenting Program provide value for money?
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the economic case for the implementation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program on a population basis in Queensland, Australia, in order to reduce the prevalence of conduct disorder in children.
Method: Threshold analysis was undertaken together with a limited cost-effectiveness analysis.
Results: The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program is a dominant intervention; that is, it costs less than the amount it saves, until the reduction in prevalence falls below 7% where net costs become positive.
Conclusions: Triple P is likely to be a worthwhile use of limited health funds. The economic case is promising, but further research is required to confirm the study results.
Similar articles
-
The economic analysis of prevention: an illustration involving children's behavior problems.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Dec;10(4):165-75. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007. PMID: 18166828 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in improving parenting and child behavior: a comparison with two other treatment conditions.Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):411-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Jan 5. Behav Res Ther. 2008. PMID: 18313033 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program on behavioral problems in children: a meta-analysis.Behav Modif. 2008 Sep;32(5):714-35. doi: 10.1177/0145445508317134. Epub 2008 May 12. Behav Modif. 2008. PMID: 18475003
-
Impact of a statewide home visiting program on parenting and on child health and development.Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Aug;31(8):829-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.02.008. Epub 2007 Sep 5. Child Abuse Negl. 2007. PMID: 17822765
-
[Strengthening parenting competences through primary prevention: one ounce of prevention weighs more than one pound of therapy].Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2007;56(8):643-59. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2007.56.8.643. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2007. PMID: 18051614 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of emergency hospital admission for violence: cross-sectional analysis of a national database in Wales.BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 24;6(8):e011169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011169. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27558900 Free PMC article.
-
The promotion of self-regulation through parenting interventions.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Mar;16(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0129-z. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23397366 Review.
-
Mapping the Specific Pathways to Early-Onset Mental Health Disorders: The "Watch Me Grow for REAL" Study Protocol.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;11:553. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00553. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32636770 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of parenting interventions for the prevention of behaviour problems in children.PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225503. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31790442 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Incremental Net Benefit of Early Intervention for Preschool-Aged Children with Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Foster Care.Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014 Jan;36:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.025. Epub 2013 Dec 5. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014. PMID: 29097828 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical