The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement
- PMID: 17465905
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01306.x
The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement
Abstract
Conspecific gamete precedence, the usage of conspecific sperm by a female that mates with both a conspecific and a heterospecific male, has been found in many taxa. We construct a population genetic model to examine the evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its coevolution with premating isolation in the process of reinforcement. Our findings suggest that conspecific gamete precedence can evolve via a process very similar to reinforcement. We explore the nature of the selection against hybridization necessary to drive this evolution. Moreover, our results confirm the prediction of Marshall et al. (Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002;17:558-563) that conspecific gamete precedence will inhibit the evolution of reinforcement between two species. We further find that reinforcement will inhibit the evolution of conspecific gamete precedence. Both reinforcement and conspecific gamete precedence increase reproductive isolation and contribute to the process of speciation. We discuss factors that may affect which of these phenomena are likely to become predominant between incipient species.
Similar articles
-
Post-mating reproductive barriers in two unidirectionally hybridizing sunfish (Centrarchidae: Lepomis).J Evol Biol. 2011 Jan;24(1):111-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02142.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28. J Evol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21029236
-
Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.Evolution. 2005 Dec;59(12):2639-55. Evolution. 2005. PMID: 16526511
-
Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.Evolution. 2005 May;59(5):1039-45. Evolution. 2005. PMID: 16136803
-
Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.Genetica. 2007 Mar;129(3):309-27. doi: 10.1007/s10709-006-0013-6. Epub 2006 Aug 10. Genetica. 2007. PMID: 16900317 Review.
-
Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition genes: pattern and process.Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Jan;102(1):66-76. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.104. Epub 2008 Nov 19. Heredity (Edinb). 2009. PMID: 19018273 Review.
Cited by
-
Climate adaptation and speciation: particular focus on reproductive barriers in Ficedula flycatchers.Evol Appl. 2015 Jun 30;9(1):119-34. doi: 10.1111/eva.12276. eCollection 2016 Jan. Evol Appl. 2015. PMID: 27087843 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating.J Insect Sci. 2018 Jul 1;18(4):17. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iey080. J Insect Sci. 2018. PMID: 30165456 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.Cells. 2021 Mar 11;10(3):620. doi: 10.3390/cells10030620. Cells. 2021. PMID: 33799610 Free PMC article.
-
Assortative mating and self-fertilization differ in their contributions to reinforcement, cascade speciation, and diversification.Curr Zool. 2016 Apr;62(2):169-181. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow004. Epub 2016 Feb 29. Curr Zool. 2016. PMID: 29491904 Free PMC article.
-
Limits to the evolution of assortative mating by female choice under restricted gene flow.Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 22;278(1703):179-87. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1174. Epub 2010 Aug 4. Proc Biol Sci. 2011. PMID: 20685708 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases