Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable
- PMID: 17466195
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.055
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable
Abstract
Background: Standardized reporting systems for diagnostic and screening tests facilitate quality improvement programs and clear communication among health care providers. Although colonoscopy is commonly used for screening, diagnosis, and therapy, no standardized reporting system for this procedure currently exists. The Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable developed a reporting and data system for colonoscopy based on continuous quality improvement indicators.
Design: The Task Group systematically reviewed quality indicators recommended by the Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and developed consensus-based terminology for reporting and data systems to capture these data elements. The Task Group included experts in several disciplines: gastroenterology, primary care, diagnostic imaging, and health care delivery.
Results and conclusions: The standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system provides a tool that can be used for efforts in continuous quality improvement within and across practices that use colonoscopy.
Similar articles
-
Developing a quality screening colonoscopy referral system in primary care practice: a report from the national colorectal cancer roundtable.CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Jan-Feb;60(1):40-9. doi: 10.3322/caac.20048. Epub 2009 Dec 18. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010. PMID: 20023050
-
Quality assurance in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;37(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 15. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 20951537 Review.
-
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun;97(6):1296-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05812.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12094842 No abstract available.
-
Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;101(4):732-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00483.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16635220
-
Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives.Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Sep;66(3):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1084. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17725947 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Endoscopy reporting standards.Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(5):286-92. doi: 10.1155/2013/145894. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23712304 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Apr;60(4):971-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3403-0. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25366146 Free PMC article.
-
Moving forward: using the experience of the CDCs' Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program to guide future colorectal cancer programming efforts.Cancer. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15(Suppl 15):2940-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28155. Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23868488 Free PMC article.
-
A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea.Intest Res. 2016 Oct;14(4):351-357. doi: 10.5217/ir.2016.14.4.351. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Intest Res. 2016. PMID: 27799886 Free PMC article.
-
Importance of determining indication for colonoscopy: implications for practice and policy original.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):1958-63.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.028. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 25606584 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical