A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot Study
- PMID: 17466225
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.052
A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot Study
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this research was to perform a feasibility study of prophylactic coronary revascularization in patients with preoperative extensive stress-induced ischemia.
Background: Prophylactic coronary revascularization in vascular surgery patients with coronary artery disease does not improve postoperative outcome. If a beneficial effect is to be expected, then at least those with extensive coronary artery disease should benefit from this strategy.
Methods: One thousand eight hundred eighty patients were screened, and those with > or =3 risk factors underwent cardiac testing using dobutamine echocardiography (17-segment model) or stress nuclear imaging (6-wall model). Those with extensive stress-induced ischemia (> or =5 segments or > or =3 walls) were randomly assigned for additional revascularization. All received beta-blockers aiming at a heart rate of 60 to 65 beats/min, and antiplatelet therapy was continued during surgery. The end points were the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction at 30 days and during 1-year follow-up.
Results: Of 430 high-risk patients, 101 (23%) showed extensive ischemia and were randomly assigned to revascularization (n = 49) or no revascularization. Coronary angiography showed 2-vessel disease in 12 (24%), 3-vessel disease in 33 (67%), and left main in 4 (8%). Two patients died after revascularization, but before operation, because of a ruptured aneurysm. Revascularization did not improve 30-day outcome; the incidence of the composite end point was 43% versus 33% (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 2.8; p = 0.30). Also, no benefit during 1-year follow-up was observed after coronary revascularization (49% vs. 44%, odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 2.3; p = 0.48).
Conclusions: In this randomized pilot study, designed to obtain efficacy and safety estimates, preoperative coronary revascularization in high-risk patients was not associated with an improved outcome.
Comment in
-
Coronary revascularization before noncardiac vascular surgery: one more step forward in understanding its role.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 1;49(17):1770-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.068. Epub 2007 Apr 16. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17466226 No abstract available.
-
High-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: to operate or not to operate?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1398-9; author reply 1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.032. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17903642 No abstract available.
-
Revascularization before noncardiac surgery: is there an impact of drug-eluting stent thrombosis?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1398; author reply 1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.043. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17903643 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-term outcome of prophylactic coronary revascularization in cardiac high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery (from the randomized DECREASE-V Pilot Study).Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 1;103(7):897-901. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.018. Epub 2009 Feb 7. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19327412 Clinical Trial.
-
Should major vascular surgery be delayed because of preoperative cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients receiving beta-blocker therapy with tight heart rate control?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):964-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.059. Epub 2006 Aug 17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16949487 Clinical Trial.
-
Coronary-artery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery.N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2795-804. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041905. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15625331 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of prophylactic coronary revascularization or medical management on patient outcomes after noncardiac surgery--a meta-analysis.Can J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;54(9):705-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03026867. Can J Anaesth. 2007. PMID: 17766738 Review.
-
Approach to the patient with prior bypass surgery.J Interv Cardiol. 2004 Oct;17(5):339-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.04033.x. J Interv Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15491339 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Every obstruction does not need a stent: an important lesson from the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial for kidney-transplant surgeons.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):4-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa157. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021. PMID: 32691062 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Frequency of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing peripheral artery disease surgery.Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):736-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.059. Epub 2012 May 24. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22633203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Controversies of Coronary Artery Disease in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: A Narrative Review.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 25;24(6):181. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406181. eCollection 2023 Jun. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077541 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative clinical variables and long-term survival following vascular surgery.World J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 26;6(10):1100-7. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i10.1100. World J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25349654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Need for elective PCI prior to noncardiac surgery: high risk through the eyes of the beholder.J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jun 26;3(3):e001068. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001068. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24970270 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical