Towards safe practice in instrumental vaginal delivery
- PMID: 17466598
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.03.006
Towards safe practice in instrumental vaginal delivery
Abstract
Approximately one in ten deliveries in the Western world is an instrumental vaginal delivery. Like other surgical operations, instrumental vaginal delivery has its complications, and the operator is obliged to critically appraise the indication for the procedure and the background risk factors, and communicate effectively with the woman. Also, it calls for team work. The safe approach to instrumental delivery should therefore be similar to that adopted for other surgical operations in terms of preoperative assessment, intraoperative precautions and postoperative care. Safe practice in instrumental delivery addresses the various types of error that may occur, and places a strong premium on operator skills, competence, and familiarity with the particular instrument. This chapter reviews good practice in the conduct of instrumental delivery, highlights what could go wrong, and outlines interventions that could reduce the incidence of harm. Issues relating to communication and consent as well as training and documentation are discussed. Indications for abandonment are outlined, and the importance of situational awareness is emphasized. Safe practice tips are amply provided.
Similar articles
-
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008. PMID: 19016358
-
Forceps delivery.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Feb;16(1):1-16. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0251. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002. PMID: 11866493 Review.
-
[Neonatal outcomes after instrumental vaginal delivery].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Dec;37 Suppl 8:S260-8. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74763-X. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008. PMID: 19268202 French.
-
Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Apr;274(1):34-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0119-6. Epub 2006 Jan 12. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006. PMID: 16408184
-
Role of operative vaginal deliveries in prevention of cesarean deliveries.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;58(2):256-62. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000104. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25811126 Review.
Cited by
-
Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes.Hippokratia. 2009 Jan;13(1):41-5. Hippokratia. 2009. PMID: 19240820 Free PMC article.
-
Forceps, Actual Use, and Potential Cesarean Section Prevention: Study in a Selected Mexican Population.J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:489267. doi: 10.1155/2015/489267. Epub 2015 Aug 24. J Pregnancy. 2015. PMID: 26380111 Free PMC article.
-
Team performance during vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: video review of obstetric multidisciplinary teams.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 20;11:1330457. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1330457. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38572162 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term neurological morbidity among children delivered by vacuum extraction - a national cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jul;102(7):843-853. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14568. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 37017927 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources