In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis
- PMID: 17466887
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.005
In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis
Abstract
Objective: To compare experimentally the image quality of charged-coupled device (CCD)-based digital, flatbed scanner digitized, and dental film radiographs.
Study design: High-contrast standardized radiographs of an aluminum step wedge containing boreholes were obtained on dental radiographic film (F) and a CCD receptor (D). Digitization (S) was done with a flatbed scanner. Each radiograph was separated into 23 single images, 18 of which showed a dark spot. Thirty observers indicated their confidence on the visibility of the spots for a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results: Mean Az values (area beneath the ROC curves) differed significantly (P < .05), being highest for D (Az = 0.76), followed by F (Az = 0.71) and S (Az = 0.60). Mean sensitivity of S (0.45) was significantly (P = .000) lower than for D (0.66) and F (0.67).
Conclusion: The difference between modality D and F was small. However, the inferior performance of S images, particularly in dark regions, could be clinically relevant.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):618-22. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014610. Acta Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18568552
-
Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996 Sep;25(4):202-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.25.4.9084274. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996. PMID: 9084274
-
Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Sep;94(3):388-94. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.126450. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002. PMID: 12324798
-
Direct digital radiography in the dental office.Int Dent J. 1995 Feb;45(1):27-34. Int Dent J. 1995. PMID: 7607741 Review.
-
Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):273-97, vi. Dent Clin North Am. 2000. PMID: 10740769 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of ambient lighting on the detection of small contrast elements in digital dental radiographs.Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1727-31. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0858-2. Epub 2012 Oct 7. Clin Oral Investig. 2013. PMID: 23053708
-
Application of Fractal Analysis in Detecting Trabecular Bone Changes in Periapical Radiograph of Patients with Periodontitis.Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 7;2021:3221448. doi: 10.1155/2021/3221448. eCollection 2021. Int J Dent. 2021. PMID: 34659416 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the display monitor on observer performance in detection of dental caries.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007 Summer;1(2):77-81. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2007.013. Epub 2007 Sep 10. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007. PMID: 23277838 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of dental root fractures by using cone-beam computed tomography.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Jul;40(5):290-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/84907460. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21697154 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics.Imaging Sci Dent. 2021 Jun;51(2):137-148. doi: 10.5624/isd.20200182. Epub 2021 Feb 9. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021. PMID: 34235059 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources