Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;56(10):1373-8.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.114512. Epub 2007 Apr 30.

Survival in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: retrospective evaluation of single-centre experience

Affiliations

Survival in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: retrospective evaluation of single-centre experience

A Al-Toma et al. Gut. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Coeliac disease may be regarded as refractory disease (RCD) when symptoms persist or recur despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet. RCD may be subdivided into types I and II with a phenotypically normal and aberrant intraepithelial T-cell population, respectively. RCD I seems to respond well to azathioprine/prednisone therapy. RCD II is usually resistant to any known therapy and transition into enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is common.

Aim: To provide further insight into RCD and the development of EATL, by reporting on long-term survival and risk of transition of RCD into EATL in a large cohort of patients with complicated coeliac disease.

Design and methods: Retrospective comparison of responses to therapy in four groups of patients with complicated coeliac disease: 43, RCD I; 50, RCD II (total), of whom 26 with RCD II developed EATL after a period of refractoriness to a gluten-free diet (secondary EATL) and 13 were EATL patients without preceding history of complicated coeliac disease (de novo EATL).

Results: No coeliac-disease-related mortality was recognised in the RCD I group. The overall 5-year survival in the RCD I group it was 96%; in the RCD II (total) group was 58%; and in the RCD II group after developing EATL it was only 8%. The 2-year survival in the de novo EATL group was 20% versus 15% in secondary EATL group (p = 0.63). Twenty-eight (56%) of the 50 patients with RCD II died, 23 (46%) due to EATL, 4 due to a progressive refractory state with emaciation and 1 from neurocoeliac disease.

Conclusion: Remarkably, no patient with RCD I developed RCD II or EATL within the mean follow-up period of 5 years (range 2-15 years). A total of 52% of the RCD II patients developed EATL within 4-6 years after the diagnosis of RCD II. More aggressive and targeted therapies seem necessary in RCD II and EATL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None to declare.

References

    1. Daum S, Cellier C, Mulder C J. Refractory coeliac disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 200519413–424. - PubMed
    1. Cellier C, Delabesse E, Helmer C.et al Refractory sprue, coeliac disease, and enteropathy‐associated T‐cell lymphoma. Lancet 2000356203–208. - PubMed
    1. Wahab P J, Meijer J W, Goerres M S.et al Coeliac disease: changing views on gluten sensitive enteropathy. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 200260–65. - PubMed
    1. Biagi F, Corazza G R. Defining gluten refractory enteropathy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 200113561–565. - PubMed
    1. Gale J, Simmonds P D, Mead G M.et al Enteropathy‐type intestinal T‐cell lymphoma: clinical features and treatment of 31 patients in a single center. J Clin Oncol 200018795–803. - PubMed