Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Nov;66(11):1485-90.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.069765. Epub 2007 May 1.

Changes in priorities for improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during 1 year of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Changes in priorities for improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during 1 year of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment

Peter M ten Klooster et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine priorities for health status improvement in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment.

Methods: Data were used from 173 patients with RA starting treatment with TNF-blocking agents. Outcome measures included assessment of health status with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) at baseline and after 3 and 12 months. The AIMS2 contains a priority list from which patients are asked to select from 12 areas of health the 3 in which they would most like to see improvement.

Results: After 1 year of treatment, 10 out of 12 areas of health on the AIMS2 were significantly improved. The most commonly selected priorities for improvement at baseline were pain (88%), hand and finger function (57%), walking and bending (42%), mobility (33%), and work (29%). At group level, this priority ranking remained largely unchanged during treatment. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, only pain was selected significantly less often at 3 and 12 months (71% at both assessments). Within individual patients, however, priorities often changed. Changes in the priority of pain were related to the achieved level of patient-perceived pain and disease activity.

Conclusions: This study shows that, at the group level, patients' priorities for improvement are fairly stable during 12 months of anti-TNF therapy, despite major improvements in health status. Although pain reduction becomes somewhat less important, it remains the most commonly selected priority. In contrast, individual patient priorities are not stable over the course of treatment and appear to be associated with differences in disease state.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson K O, Bradley L A, Young L D, McDaniel L K, Wise C M. Rheumatoid arthritis: review of psychological factors related to etiology, effects and treatment. Psychol Bull 198598358–387. - PubMed
    1. Lapsley H M, March L M, Tribe K L, Cross M J, Courtenay B G, Brooks P M. Living with rheumatoid arthritis: expenditures, health status and social impact on patients. Ann Rheum Dis 200261818–821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meenan R F, Yelin E H, Nevitt M, Epstein W V. The impact of chronic disease: a sociomedical profile of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 198124544–549. - PubMed
    1. Yelin E, Lubeck D, Holman H, Epstein W. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: the activities of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared to controls. J Rheumatol 198714710–717. - PubMed
    1. Gill T M, Feinstein A R. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality‐of‐life measurements. JAMA 1994272619–626. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances