Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):1112-5.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038299. Epub 2007 May 1.

Outcome of treatment in children with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Outcome of treatment in children with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

James B Nachman et al. Blood. .

Abstract

One-hundred thirty-nine patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and hypodiploidy (fewer than 45 chromosomes) were collected from 10 different national ALL study groups and single institutions. Patients were stratified by modal chromosome number into 4 groups: 24 to 29 (N = 46); 33 to 39 (N = 26); 40 to 43 (N = 13); and 44 (N = 54) chromosomes. Nine patients were Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive (4 cases: 44 chromosomes; 5 cases: 40-43 chromosomes) and were not considered further. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the remaining 130 patients were 38.5% +/- 4.4% and 49.8% +/- 4.2% at 8 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in outcome between patients with 24 to 29, 33 to 39, or 40 to 43 chromosomes. Compared with patients with fewer than 44 chromosomes, patients with 44 chromosomes had a significantly better EFS (P = .01; 8-year estimate, 52.2% vs 30.1%) and OS (P = .017; 69% vs 37.5%). For patients with 44 chromosomes, monosomy 7, the presence of a dicentric chromosome, or both predicted a worse EFS but similar OS. Doubling of the hypodiploid clone occurred in 32 patients (24-29 chromosomes [n = 25] and 33-39 chromosomes [n = 7]) and had no prognostic implication. Children and adolescents with ALL and hypodiploidy with fewer than 44 chromosomes have a poor outcome despite contemporary therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of modal chromosome numbers in hypodiploid cases with fewer than 44 chromosomes. There are no patients with 30, 31, 32, or 42 chromosomes. For 2 patients, modal chromosome number could not be accurately determined.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EFS and OS for non-Ph+ hypodiploid patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of EFS for non-Ph+ hypodiploid patients with 44 chromosomes or fewer than 44 chromosomes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of survival for non-Ph+ hypodiploid patients with 44 chromosomes or fewer than 44 chromosomes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
EFS for 130 evaluable, non-Ph+ patients by modal chromosome number: 44 chromosomes, 40 to 43 chromosomes, 30 to 39 chromosomes, and 24 to 29 chromosomes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
OS for 130 evaluable, non-Ph+ patients by modal chromosome number: 44 chromosomes, 40 to 43 chromosomes, 30 to 39 chromosomes, and 24 to 29 chromosomes.

References

    1. Chessels JM, Swansbury GJ, Reeves B, Bailey CC, Richards SM. Cytogenetics and prognosis in childhood lymphoblastic leukemia: results of MRC UKALL X. Br J Haematol. 1997;99:93–100. - PubMed
    1. Moorman AV, Richards SM, Martineau M, et al. Outcome heterogeneity in childhood high-hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2003;102:2756–2762. - PubMed
    1. Heerema NA, Sather HN, Sensel MG, et al. Prognostic impact of trisomies of chromosomes 10, 17, and 5 among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and high hyperdiploidy (> 50 chromosomes). J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1876–1887. - PubMed
    1. Raimondi SC, Zhou Y, Mathew S, et al. Reassessment of the prognostic significance of hypodiploidy in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2003;98:2715–2722. - PubMed
    1. Harrison CJ, Moorman AV, Broadfield ZJ, et al. Three distinct subgroups of hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2004;125:522–559. - PubMed

Publication types