Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Aug;10(8):620-4.
doi: 10.1007/BF01975812.

Evaluation of the new improved BHI-lysis blood culture medium for the BCB Roche system

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the new improved BHI-lysis blood culture medium for the BCB Roche system

P Rohner et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Aug.

Abstract

The new BHI-lysis blood culture medium for the BCB system (BCB release, Hoffmann-La Roche), which lyses blood cells, was compared with the BHI-S broth of the same BCB system and the Signal system (Oxoid). A total of 2394 sets consisting of three bottles were each inoculated with 7 ml of blood at the bedside. In the laboratory agar-coated paddles were attached to the BHI-lysis and the BHI-S bottles, and the Signal device was mounted onto the Oxoid bottle. All systems were incubated at 35 degrees C for seven days. Of the 309 (13%) positive sets, 73 (3%) were contaminated and in 242 (10%) sets a total of 250 pathogenic microorganisms were isolated. These could be grown significantly more often from the BHI-lysis bottle (n = 213) than from either the BHI-S (n = 189) or Signal bottle (n = 176). No significant differences in the time needed to achieve a positive result was noted between the BHI-lysis and BHI-S bottles, but comparison of the BHI-lysis and Signal bottles revealed that overall pathogens were detected earlier significantly more often with the BHI-lysis bottle. In view of the good performance of blood culture broths containing lysing agents, their wider use is warranted in future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):413-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Feb;8(2):150-3 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Mar;19(3):315-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):901-5 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35-53 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources