Evaluation of a chemiluminometric immunoassay and a direct immunofluorescence test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens
- PMID: 1748122
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01975822
Evaluation of a chemiluminometric immunoassay and a direct immunofluorescence test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens
Abstract
A new chemiluminometric immunoassay (Magic Lite) and a direct immunofluorescence technique (MicroTrak) were compared with cell culture in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Both assays were evaluated using 260 genital specimens (89 men, 171 women), 26 of which were culture positive. The respective sensitivity of the chemiluminometric immunoassay and immunofluorescence technique was 88.5% and 84.6%, the specificity 97% and 99.6%, the positive predictive value 76.7% and 95.6%, and the negative predictive value 98.7% and 98.3%. Both methods could serve as an alternative to culture in the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydial infections.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a chemiluminometric immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urine of male and female patients.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;11(8):704-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01989974. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992. PMID: 1425728
-
Evaluation of a new chemiluminometric immunoassay, Magic Lite Chlamydia, for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis antigen from urogenital specimens.Sex Transm Dis. 1992 May-Jun;19(3):161-4. Sex Transm Dis. 1992. PMID: 1523532
-
Magic Lite Chlamydia immunoassay in urogenital samples and urine versus chlamydial culture.Int J STD AIDS. 1994 May-Jun;5(3):207-11. doi: 10.1177/095646249400500310. Int J STD AIDS. 1994. PMID: 8061093
-
Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.Genitourin Med. 1991 Jun;67(3):256-66. doi: 10.1136/sti.67.3.256. Genitourin Med. 1991. PMID: 2071132 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laboratory techniques in ocular virology.Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1975 Winter;15(4):1-18. doi: 10.1097/00004397-197501540-00003. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1975. PMID: 773878 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Clearview Chlamydia.J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1620-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1620-1622.1994. J Clin Microbiol. 1994. PMID: 8077420 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;11(6):499-503. doi: 10.1007/BF01960803. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992. PMID: 1526232 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of a chemiluminometric immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urine of male and female patients.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;11(8):704-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01989974. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992. PMID: 1425728
-
Evaluation of Clearview and Magic Lite tests, polymerase chain reaction, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3204-10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3204-3210.1993. J Clin Microbiol. 1993. PMID: 8308112 Free PMC article.