Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991;41(3):211-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00315432.

Superior local tolerability of human versus salmon calcitonin preparations in young healthy volunteers

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Superior local tolerability of human versus salmon calcitonin preparations in young healthy volunteers

C Wüster et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991.

Abstract

Possible local and systemic adverse effects following administration of salmon (sCT) and human (hCT) calcitonin (CT) have been evaluated in a double-blind, within-subject, comparative trial in 30 young, healthy volunteers. Each subject received 0.25 and 0.5 mg hCT and 100 IU sCT s.c.. Adverse effects and hypocalcaemia were recorded 1, 3 and 6 h after each injection. Significantly fewer local adverse reactions were observed after hCT (20 or 33%) than after sCT (80%), possibly due to the different vehicles employed (mannitol solution and acetic acid). The most frequent systemic adverse effects were gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting), which occurred in 80% after 1 h, independently of the CT--preparation used. Hypocalcaemic changes were generally small and lasted longer after sCT. It is concluded that the hCT preparations were better tolerated locally than sCT in young, healthy volunteers, and that there were no differences in the systemic side effects or hypocalcaemic activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nephron. 1987;47(4):241-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Feb;3(2):229-36 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979 Apr;132(4):541-5 - PubMed
    1. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1982 Feb 5;94(3):67-75 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1971 Dec;50(12):2689-702 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources