Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies
- PMID: 17482613
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.056
Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies
Abstract
Objective: 1) To investigate the relationship between operator experience and the success of outpatient hysteroscopy; and 2) to determine if the introduction of normal saline and the use of narrow-caliber hysteroscopes and vaginoscopic approach are associated with a lower failure rate.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Teaching-hospital based outpatient hysteroscopy clinic.
Patient(s): Five thousand consecutive women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy between October 1988 and June 2003.
Intervention(s): The hysteroscopies were carried out both by experienced operators and by trainees. Procedures were performed using 4-mm and 2.9-mm telescopes with 5-mm and 3.5-mm diagnostic sheaths, respectively. Between October 1988 and 1996, the uterine cavity was distended with CO(2) (CO(2) period), whereas normal saline was preferred after 1997 (1997-2003: saline period). Traditional technique of hysteroscope insertion and vaginoscopic approach were used depending on operator preference and experience and patient characteristics.
Main outcome measure(s): Success, failure, and complication rates.
Result(s): The hysteroscopies were successfully performed in nearly 95% of cases by 362 operators (mean 13.8 hysteroscopies per operator) with different levels of expertise. Failure and complication rates were 5.2% and 5.4%, respectively, without any significant difference between CO(2) and saline periods. Vasovagal attacks and shoulder pain were significantly higher during the CO(2) period. The success of outpatient hysteroscopy was negatively affected by postmenopausal status, nulliparity, need for cervical dilatation or local anaesthesia, traditional technique of hysteroscope insertion, and use of a 5-mm hysteroscope.
Conclusion(s): A high level of expertise is not a prerequisite to performing hysteroscopy on an outpatient basis. Recent advances in technique and instrumentation facilitate this approach and might encourage greater adoption by the wider gynecology community.
Similar articles
-
Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases.Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):199-202. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00546-6. Fertil Steril. 2003. PMID: 12849824
-
Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the 'no-touch' technique.BJOG. 2005 Jul;112(7):963-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00425.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 15958000 Clinical Trial.
-
[Continuous flow hysteroscopy. An improved endoscopic method for examination of the uterine cavity].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Apr 20;115(10):1228-9. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995. PMID: 7754490 Norwegian.
-
[Hysteroscopy requirements and complications].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):451-7. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923835 Review. Italian.
-
What does 'diagnostic hysteroscopy' mean today? The role of the new techniques.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;15(4):303-8. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000084241.09900.c8. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12858102 Review.
Cited by
-
Three Thousand Cases of Office Hysteroscopy: See and Treat an Indian Experience.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Oct;70(5):384-389. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01334-4. Epub 2020 Jul 17. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020. PMID: 33041557 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Gynecologic Procedures prior to and during the Utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review.J Pathog. 2016;2016:4698314. doi: 10.1155/2016/4698314. Epub 2016 Mar 7. J Pathog. 2016. PMID: 27047692 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preoperative promestriene for hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Jul 19;70(6):e20231559. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231559. eCollection 2024. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024. PMID: 39045953 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07126-1. Epub 2023 Jul 10. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 37428263 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation: From Indications to Instrumentation and Techniques-A Call to Action.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;13(3):339. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030339. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36766443 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical