Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul;176(3):1653-61.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.074666. Epub 2007 May 4.

Mutational bias for body size in rhabditid nematodes

Affiliations

Mutational bias for body size in rhabditid nematodes

Dejerianne Ostrow et al. Genetics. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Mutational bias is a potentially important agent of evolution, but it is difficult to disentangle the effects of mutation from those of natural selection. Mutation-accumulation experiments, in which mutations are allowed to accumulate at very small population size, thus minimizing the efficiency of natural selection, are the best way to separate the effects of mutation from those of selection. Body size varies greatly among species of nematode in the family rhabditidae; mutational biases are both a potential cause and a consequence of that variation. We report data on the cumulative effects of mutations that affect body size in three species of rhabditid nematode that vary fivefold in adult size. Results are very consistent with previous studies of mutations underlying fitness in the same strains: two strains of Caenorhabditis briggsae decline in body size about twice as fast as two strains of C. elegans, with a concomitant higher point estimate of the genomic mutation rate; the confamilial Oscheius myriophila is intermediate. There is an overall mutational bias, such that mutations reduce size on average, but the bias appears consistent between species. The genetic correlation between mutations that affect size and those underlying fitness is large and positive, on average.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>igure</sc> 1.—
Figure 1.—
Distributions of mean body volumes in control (solid bars) and mutation-accumulation (open bars) lines for the two strains of Oscheius myriophila [DF (a) and EM (b)], two strains of Caenorhabditis elegans [N2 (c) and PB306 (d)], and C. briggsae [HK (e) and PB800 (f)].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ávila, V., D. Chavarrías, E. Sánchez, A. Manrique, C. López-Fanjul et al., 2006. Increase of spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173: 267–277. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azevedo, R. B., P. D. Keightley, C. Lauren-Maatta, L. L. Vassilieva, M. Lynch et al., 2002. Spontaneous mutational variation for body size in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 162: 755–765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer, C. F., F. Shaw, C. Steding, M. Baurngartner, A. Hawkins et al., 2005. Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 5785–5790. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer, C. F., N. Phillips, D. Ostrow, A. Avalos, D. Blanton et al., 2006. Cumulative effects of spontaneous mutations for fitness in Caenorhabditis: role of genotype, environment and stress. Genetics 174: 1387–1395. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjedov, I., O. Tenaillon, B. Gerard, V. Souza, E. Denamur et al., 2003. Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Science 300: 1404–1409. - PubMed

Publication types