Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;52(5):622-31; discussion 631-5.

Respiratory controversies in the critical care setting. Should recruitment maneuvers be used in the management of ALI and ARDS?

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17484793

Respiratory controversies in the critical care setting. Should recruitment maneuvers be used in the management of ALI and ARDS?

Robert M Kacmarek et al. Respir Care. 2007 May.

Abstract

Lung recruitment maneuvers are being used in the management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, but recruitment maneuvers are controversial. The proponents argue that when properly applied to appropriately selected patients, they are effective and can be safely applied. The expectation is that the recruitment maneuver will change the course of ARDS and improve outcomes. Those opposed to recruitment maneuvers argue that no data indicate better outcomes with recruitment maneuvers and that they are potentially unsafe. Outcome data are clearly needed before recruitment maneuvers can be fully incorporated into clinical practice. If a recruitment maneuver is conducted, a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial must be done to determine the minimum PEEP that sustains the benefits of the recruitment maneuver. We explore both sides of the lung recruitment controversy.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms