Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma
- PMID: 17488456
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x
Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma
Abstract
Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the TonoPen and the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements taken with Pascal DCT and the TonoPen was evaluated.
Methods: One eye in each of 101 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement and IOP evaluation with GAT, Pascal DCT and the TonoPen in random order. The agreement between results from Pascal DCT and the TonoPen and those of GAT was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The deviation of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from GAT values, corrected for CCT, was calculated and correlated to CCT using a linear regression model.
Results: The mean of the differences in IOP measurements was 3.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg for Pascal DCT minus GAT readings and 0.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg for TonoPen minus GAT readings. The 95% confidence interval of differences in IOP measurements was higher between TonoPen and GAT readings (- 6 to 7 mmHg) than between Pascal and GAT readings (0.1-6.8 mmHg). Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP compared with GAT, especially for higher IOP readings. Bland-Altman scatterplots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between Pascal DCT and GAT measurements, and poor agreement between TonoPen and GAT measurements. The deviations of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from the corrected GAT values were both highly correlated with CCT values (linear regression analysis, p < 0.0001). The mean change in measured IOP for a 10-microm increase in CCT was 0.48 mmHg for Pascal DCT and 0.74 mmHg for the TonoPen.
Conclusions: Agreement with GAT measurements was higher for Pascal DCT than for TonoPen readings; however, Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP values compared with GAT. Measurements of IOP obtained with both Pascal DCT and the TonoPen appeared to be influenced by CCT, and this influence appeared to be greater for the latter.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;142(4):583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.030. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 17011849 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):262-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102. Epub 2008 Jan 25. Eye (Lond). 2009. PMID: 18219335
-
The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89(12):1572-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075580. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 16299132 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;72(Suppl 3):S398-S403. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_907_23. Epub 2023 Dec 15. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38099358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Contemporary possibilities of intraocular pressure measurement].Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2013 Oct;69(4):175-80. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2013. PMID: 24437996 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.Int Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;30(6):651-9. doi: 10.1007/s10792-010-9377-9. Epub 2010 May 25. Int Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20499265
-
Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;64(2):132-5. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.179723. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27050348 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients.Open Ophthalmol J. 2016 Feb 29;10:44-55. doi: 10.2174/1874364101610010044. eCollection 2016. Open Ophthalmol J. 2016. PMID: 27014387 Free PMC article.
-
Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;248(11):1611-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1462-2. Epub 2010 Jul 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20652303
-
Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss.Open Ophthalmol J. 2018 Jun 22;12:104-109. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010104. eCollection 2018. Open Ophthalmol J. 2018. PMID: 30008972 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources