Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes
- PMID: 17488997
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm003
Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes with activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy in patients with Class II malocclusions caused by maxillary prognathism and mandibular retrognathism. The subjects, all in the mixed dentition, were selected from a single centre and were divided into two groups: 28 patients were treated with an incisor double capping activator and a high-pull headgear combination appliance (13 girls, 15 boys mean chronological age 11.7 +/- 1.2 years, skeletal age 12.1 +/- 1.4 years) and an untreated group of 28 subjects (14 girls, 14 boys mean chronological mean age 11.9 +/- 1.1 years, skeletal age 12.3 +/- 1.3 years). The skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes that occurred were compared on lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T0) and after 1.1 +/- 0.3 years when the combination appliance was removed (T1). In the control group, the radiographs were obtained at the start (T0) and after an observation period 1.2 +/- 0.4 years (T1). Statistical analysis was undertaken with Wilcoxon's ranked-sum test for intra-group comparisons and differences between groups with t-test and Bonferroni's test at a level of significance of P < 0.05. Activator and high-pull headgear combination treatment in these growing patients resulted in a correction of the skeletal Class II relationship (ANB -3.4 degrees), a restriction of maxillary growth (SNA -2.0 degrees, OLp-A -2.3 mm), an advancement of the mandibular structures (SNB +2.6 degrees, FH-NPg +2.3 degrees, OLp-B +2.7 mm, OLp-Pg +2.2 mm), an increase in lower face height (ANS-Me +3.9 mm), a correction of the overjet (-5.4 mm), an improvement in overbite (-2.2 mm), uprighting of the maxillary incisors (U1-FH -5.3 degrees, OLp-U1 -2.5 mm), protrusion of the mandibular incisors (IMPA +2.0 degrees, OLp-L1 +2.7 mm), and a correction of the dental Class II malocclusion (OLp-L6 +3.5 mm). The soft tissue profile changes were a correction of facial convexity (G'-Sn-Pg' angle 2.3 degrees, Mlf-Li-x-axis angle 9.1 degrees), and an increase in lower antero-posterior (Mlf-y-axis 5.6 mm, Pg'-y-axis 5.3 mm), and lower vertical (Sls-x-axis 3.8 mm, Pg'-x-axis 3.8 mm, Me'-x-axis 5.1 mm) soft tissue dimensions. The mentolabial fold depth (Mlf-E line) also significantly decreased, -0.8 mm in the treated group. The activator and high-pull headgear combination appliance was effective in treating growing patients with maxillary prognathism, mandibular deficiency, and facial convexity by a combination of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes and improvement in the soft tissue facial profile.
Similar articles
-
Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):28-35. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp042. Epub 2009 May 28. Eur J Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19477971
-
Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.Eur J Orthod. 2004 Jun;26(3):293-302. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.3.293. Eur J Orthod. 2004. PMID: 15222715
-
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17628251 Clinical Trial.
-
Realities of craniofacial growth modification.Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Mar;9(1):23-51. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11905336 Review.
-
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in growing class II malocclusion patients during nonextraction orthodontic treatment.SADJ. 2006 Sep;61(8):344-50. SADJ. 2006. PMID: 17165248 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4861924. doi: 10.1155/2017/4861924. Epub 2017 Jan 22. Biomed Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28203569 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical effects of Teuscher activator in hyperdivergent Class II malocclusion treatment: A finite element analysis.J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):e1124-e1130. doi: 10.4317/jced.58722. eCollection 2021 Nov. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021. PMID: 34824699 Free PMC article.
-
Does Appliance Design Affect Treatment Outcomes of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion? A Two-Center Retrospective Study.J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021 Jun 30;12(2):e4. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2021.12204. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021. PMID: 34377381 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of the combination of myofunctional therapy (lip exercises) and activator high-pull headgear in the closure of interlabial gap in long-face skeletal class II patients with lip incompetence: A 6-8-month longitudinal randomized clinical trial.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jan 25;21:3. eCollection 2024. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024. PMID: 38425317 Free PMC article.
-
Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02709-5. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 36732724 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous