Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans
- PMID: 17490738
- PMCID: PMC2045695
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.03.016
Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans
Abstract
Recent clinical research indicates that d-amphetamine is effective in treating cocaine and methamphetamine dependence. There is concern, however, with the use of d-amphetamine as a pharmacotherapy because acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases inhibition in cocaine-using individuals and may increase drug-taking behavior. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether acute d-amphetamine pretreatment would alter the reinforcing, subject-rated, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine. To this end, 7 human volunteers first sampled doses of oral d-amphetamine (0, 8, and 16 mg). These doses engender moderate drug taking and were selected to avoid a ceiling or floor effect. Volunteers were then allowed to self-administer these sampled doses using a modified progressive-ratio procedure in two sessions in which they received pretreatment with either 0 or 15 mg oral d-amphetamine 2 h prior to completing the modified progressive-ratio procedure. d-Amphetamine produced prototypical stimulant-like effects (e.g., increased ratings of stimulated, elevated blood pressure) and maintained responding on the modified progressive-ratio schedule. Pretreatment with 15 mg oral d-amphetamine also produced prototypical stimulant-like effects, but failed to alter break points for d-amphetamine on the modified progressive-ratio procedure relative to placebo pretreatment. These results indicate that acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not increase stimulant self-administration.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Human sex differences in d-amphetamine self-administration.Addiction. 2010 Apr;105(4):727-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02858.x. Epub 2010 Feb 9. Addiction. 2010. PMID: 20148783 Free PMC article.
-
Selective dopamine D3 receptor partial agonist (±)VK4-40 reduces the reinforcing strength of d-amphetamine but not cocaine in rhesus monkeys responding under a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Dec 1;265:112494. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112494. Epub 2024 Nov 5. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024. PMID: 39527868
-
Reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine: influence of novel ratios on a progressive-ratio schedule.Behav Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;21(8):745-53. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32833fa7b3. Behav Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 20944503 Free PMC article.
-
Human behavioral pharmacology of stimulant drugs: An update and narrative review.Adv Pharmacol. 2022;93:77-103. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Adv Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35341574 Review.
-
Reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: sensitivity of progressive-ratio schedules.Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;16(6):503-12. doi: 10.1037/a0013657. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008. PMID: 19086771 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?Behav Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;24(5-6):533-42. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283645047. Behav Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23881044 Free PMC article.
-
Amphetamine self-administration in light and moderate drinkers.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Mar;35(3):443-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01361.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011. PMID: 21158875 Free PMC article.
-
An Exploration of Responses to Drug Conditioned Stimuli during Treatment for Substance Dependence.J Addict. 2013;2013:394064. doi: 10.1155/2013/394064. Epub 2013 Aug 26. J Addict. 2013. PMID: 24826360 Free PMC article.
-
Human sex differences in d-amphetamine self-administration.Addiction. 2010 Apr;105(4):727-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02858.x. Epub 2010 Feb 9. Addiction. 2010. PMID: 20148783 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of aripiprazole pretreatment on the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in humans.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 2;47:111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 28. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23994622 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abreu ME, Griffiths RR. Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies. Psychopharmacology. 1996;125:255–7. - PubMed
-
- Angrist B, Corwin J, Bartlik B, Cooper T. Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral d-amphetamine in normal subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 1987;22:1357–68. - PubMed
-
- Barrett AC, Miller JR, Dohrmann JM, Caine SB. Effects of dopamine indirect agonists and selective D1-like and D2-like agonists and antagonists on cocaine self-administration and food maintained responding in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47(Suppl 1):256–73. - PubMed
-
- Barrett SP, Tichauer M, Leyton M, Pihl RO. Nicotine increases alcohol self-administration in non-dependent male smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81:197–204. - PubMed
-
- Bigelow GE, Griffiths RR, Liebson IA. Pharmacological influences upon human ethanol self-administration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1977;85B:523–38. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources