Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;87(1):20-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans

Affiliations

Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans

William W Stoops et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007 May.

Abstract

Recent clinical research indicates that d-amphetamine is effective in treating cocaine and methamphetamine dependence. There is concern, however, with the use of d-amphetamine as a pharmacotherapy because acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases inhibition in cocaine-using individuals and may increase drug-taking behavior. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether acute d-amphetamine pretreatment would alter the reinforcing, subject-rated, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine. To this end, 7 human volunteers first sampled doses of oral d-amphetamine (0, 8, and 16 mg). These doses engender moderate drug taking and were selected to avoid a ceiling or floor effect. Volunteers were then allowed to self-administer these sampled doses using a modified progressive-ratio procedure in two sessions in which they received pretreatment with either 0 or 15 mg oral d-amphetamine 2 h prior to completing the modified progressive-ratio procedure. d-Amphetamine produced prototypical stimulant-like effects (e.g., increased ratings of stimulated, elevated blood pressure) and maintained responding on the modified progressive-ratio schedule. Pretreatment with 15 mg oral d-amphetamine also produced prototypical stimulant-like effects, but failed to alter break points for d-amphetamine on the modified progressive-ratio procedure relative to placebo pretreatment. These results indicate that acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not increase stimulant self-administration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dose-response function for d-amphetamine for number of capsules earned on the Modified Progressive-Ratio Procedure as a function of pretreatment condition. X-axis: total d-amphetamine dose (mg). The dose per capsule was 0 mg d-amphetamine (placebo [PL]), 1 mg d-amphetamine (8 mg dose) and 2 mg d-amphetamine (16 mg dose). The maximum number of capsules earned was 8. Brackets indicate one S.E.M. Unidirectional brackets were used for clarity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose- and Time-response functions for sampling doses of d-amphetamine for scores on the BG, MBG, and PCAG scales of the ARCI and subject ratings of Active/Alert/Energetic, Any Effect, Like Drug, Good Effects, Stimulated and Willing to Take Again from the Drug-Effect Questionnaire during Sampling Sessions. X-axis: hours following drug administration. The maximum score on the subject-rated measures was 4. Filled symbols are significantly different from placebo at that time point. Brackets indicate one S.E.M.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose- and Time-response functions for pretreatment doses of d-amphetamine for scores on the BG, MBG, and PCAG scales of the ARCI and subject ratings of Active/Alert/Energetic, Any Effect, Like Drug, Good Effects, Stimulated and Willing to Take Again from the Drug-Effect Questionnaire following administration of the pretreatment dose during Self-Administration Sessions. X-axis: hours following drug administration. The maximum score on the subject-rated measures was 4. Filled symbols are significantly different from placebo at that time point. Brackets indicate one S.E.M.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abreu ME, Griffiths RR. Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies. Psychopharmacology. 1996;125:255–7. - PubMed
    1. Angrist B, Corwin J, Bartlik B, Cooper T. Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral d-amphetamine in normal subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 1987;22:1357–68. - PubMed
    1. Barrett AC, Miller JR, Dohrmann JM, Caine SB. Effects of dopamine indirect agonists and selective D1-like and D2-like agonists and antagonists on cocaine self-administration and food maintained responding in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47(Suppl 1):256–73. - PubMed
    1. Barrett SP, Tichauer M, Leyton M, Pihl RO. Nicotine increases alcohol self-administration in non-dependent male smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81:197–204. - PubMed
    1. Bigelow GE, Griffiths RR, Liebson IA. Pharmacological influences upon human ethanol self-administration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1977;85B:523–38. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances