Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May 11:8:28.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-28.

Observational studies of depression in primary care: what do we know?

Gail Gilchrist  1 , Jane Gunn
Affiliations

Observational studies of depression in primary care: what do we know?

Gail Gilchrist et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: We undertook a systematic review of observational studies of depression in primary care to determine 1) the nature and scope of the published studies 2) the methodological quality of the studies; 3) the identified recovery and risk factors for persistent depression and 3) the treatment and health service use patterns among patients.

Methods: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO using combinations of topic and keywords, and Medical Subject Headings in MEDLINE, Headings in CINAHL and descriptors in PsycINFO. Searches were limited to adult populations and articles published in English during 1985-2006.

Results: 40 articles from 17 observational cohort studies were identified, most were undertaken in the US or Europe. Studies varied widely in aims and methods making it difficult to meaningfully compare the results. Methodological limitations were common including: selection bias of patients and physicians; small sample sizes (range 35-108 patients at baseline and 20-59 patients at follow-up); and short follow-up times limiting the extent to which these studies can be used to inform our understanding of recovery and relapse among primary care patients with depression. Risk factors for the persistence of depression identified in this review were: severity and chronicity of the depressive episode, the presence of suicidal thoughts, antidepressant use, poorer self-reported quality of life, lower self-reported social support, experiencing key life events, lower education level and unemployment.

Conclusion: Despite the growing interest in depression being managed as a chronic illness, this review identified only 17 observational studies of depression in primary care, most of which have included small sample sizes and been relatively short-term. Future research should be large enough to investigate risk factors for chronicity and relapse, and should be conducted over a longer time frame.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search strategies limited to articles published in English during 1985–2006 and adult populations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of articles included in the review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Murray C, Lopez A. The Global Burden of Disease. Boston, Mass, World Health Organisation and Harvard University Press; 1996.
    1. Culpepper L. The active management of depression. Journal of Family Practice. 2002;51:769–776. - PubMed
    1. Lin EH, Katon WJ, VonKorff M, Russo JE, Simon GE, Bush TM, Rutter CM, Walker EA, Ludman E. Relapse of depression in primary care. Rate and clinical predictors. Archives of Family Medicine. 1998;7:443–449. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.5.443. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katon W, Schulberg H. Epidemiology of Depression in Primary Care. General Hospital Psychiatry. 1992;14:237–247. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(92)90094-Q. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Schers HJ, van den Bosch WJ, van den Hoogen H, Zitman FG. Long-term follow-up of depression among patients in the community and in family practice settings: A systematic review. The Journal of Family Practice. 2000;49:1113–1120. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances