Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jun;11(2):113-23.
doi: 10.1177/1084713807301084.

Issues associated with the measurement of psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs

Affiliations
Review

Issues associated with the measurement of psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs

Jill E Preminger. Trends Amplif. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to describe the psychosocial effects of hearing loss, review the literature that has attempted to measure the psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs, and offer suggestions for the design of future studies. The psychosocial aspects of hearing loss are multidimensional and may include the emotional, cognitive, interpersonal, behavioral, and physical responses to hearing loss. As a result of the stigma of hearing loss, individuals may isolate themselves, avoid social interactions, and/or bluff their way through communication breakdowns. Participation in group audiologic rehabilitation programs is a straightforward way to deal with the stigma and the loss of social identity associated with hearing loss, and these groups are an ideal forum for teaching communication strategies. Yet, the literature on the efficacy of group audiologic rehabilitation has produced equivocal results. Several factors may have contributed to the lack of psychosocial benefits reported in the literature, including the theoretical framework upon which the program was designed, the actual class content, the effectiveness of the outcome measures, and the demographic characteristics of the participants in the programs. Future research should determine (1) if the theoretical framework and/or the content covered in group audiologic rehabilitation programs influences the psychosocial outcomes, (2) if instructor training influences psychosocial outcomes, (3) the ideal test battery to assess the psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs, (4) the participant demographic and personality characteristics that influence psychosocial outcomes, and (5) whether experienced hearing aid users have different hearing-loss related psychosocial needs than new hearing aid users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hawkins DB. Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16: 485–493 - PubMed
    1. Hétu R. The stigma attached to hearing impairment. Scand Audiol. 1996;25(suppl 43): 12–24 - PubMed
    1. Hogan A. Hearing Rehabilitation for Deafened Adults: A Psychosocial Approach. London: Whurr Publishers; 2001
    1. Trychin S. Guidelines for providing mental health services to people who are hard of hearing. Rep. no. ED466082, University of California, San Diego; 2002.
    1. Kaplan H, Bally S, Garretson C. Speechreading: A Way to Improve Understanding. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University; Press; 1985

Publication types