Bone formation on the apatite-coated zirconia porous scaffolds within a rabbit calvarial defect
- PMID: 17494967
- DOI: 10.1177/0885328207078075
Bone formation on the apatite-coated zirconia porous scaffolds within a rabbit calvarial defect
Abstract
Previously, a strong and bioactive ceramic scaffold consisting of a porous zirconia body coated with apatite double layers (fluorapatite (FA) as an inner layer and hydroxyapatite (HA) as an outer layer) was successfully fabricated. In this contribution, the authors investigate the in vivo performance of the engineered bioceramic scaffolds using a rabbit calvarial defect model. In particular, the porosity and pore size of the scaffolds are varied in order to observe the geometrical effects of the scaffolds on their bone formation behaviors. The scaffolds supported on a zirconia framework can be produced with an extremely high porosity (approximately 84-87%), while retaining excellent compressive strength (approximately 7-8 MPa), which has been unachievable in the case of pure apatite scaffolds (approximately 74% porosity with approximately 2 MPa strength). The experimental groups used in this study include three types of zirconia scaffolds coated with apatite; high porosity (approximately 87%) with large pore size (approximately 500- 700 microm): AZ-HL, high porosity (approximately 84%) with small pore size (approximately 150-200 microm): AZ-HS, and low porosity (approximately 75%) with large pore size (approximately 500-700 microm): AZ-LL, as well as one type of HA porous scaffold: low porosity (approximately 74%) with a large pore size (approximately 500-700 microm) for the purpose of comparison. The scaffolds prepared with dimensions of approximately 10 mm (diameter) x 1.2 mm (thickness) are grafted in rabbit calvaria defects. The histological sections are made at 4 and 12 weeks after surgery and immunohistochemical analyses are performed on the samples. All of the specimens show a good healing response without adverse tissue reactions. Good healing is shown at 4 weeks post-surgery with the ingrowth of new bone into the macropore-channels of the scaffolds. The newly formed bone amounts to approximately 19.9-24.2% of the initial defect area, depending on the scaffold type, but there is no statistical significance between the scaffold groups. However, the defects without the scaffolds (control group) show a significantly lower bone formation ratio (approximately 4.3%). At twelve weeks after surgery, the extent of new bone formation is more pronounced in all of the scaffold groups. All of the scaffold groups show significantly higher bone formation ratios (26.7-46.9%) with respect to the control without the graft. In the comparison between the scaffold groups, those with high porosities (AZ-HL and AZ-HS) exhibit significantly higher bone formation as compared to the scaffold with low porosity (AZ-LL). Based on the present in vivo test performed within a rabbit calvaria defect model, it is concluded that the apatite-coated zirconia scaffolds show good bone forming ability and are considered to be a promising scaffolding material for bone regeneration since they possess a high level of both mechanical and biological properties.
Similar articles
-
Preparation and characterization of a multilayer biomimetic scaffold for bone tissue engineering.J Biomater Appl. 2007 Nov;22(3):223-39. doi: 10.1177/0885328206073706. Epub 2007 Jan 25. J Biomater Appl. 2007. PMID: 17255157
-
Preparation and biocompatibility evaluation of apatite/wollastonite-derived porous bioactive glass ceramic scaffolds.Biomed Mater. 2009 Aug;4(4):045007. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045007. Epub 2009 Jul 16. Biomed Mater. 2009. PMID: 19605959
-
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(27):5474-91. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. Biomaterials. 2005. PMID: 15860204 Review.
-
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(8):1399-409. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.016. Epub 2005 Oct 5. Biomaterials. 2006. PMID: 16169074
-
Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials. 2006 Jun;27(18):3413-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Biomaterials. 2006. PMID: 16504284 Review.
Cited by
-
Three-Dimensional Zirconia-Based Scaffolds for Load-Bearing Bone-Regeneration Applications: Prospects and Challenges.Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;14(12):3207. doi: 10.3390/ma14123207. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34200817 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regeneration of Critical-Sized Mandibular Defects Using 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds: A Quantitative Evaluation of New Bone Formation in In Vivo Studies.Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Aug;12(21):e2300128. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300128. Epub 2023 May 15. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023. PMID: 37186456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bone regeneration using an injectable calcium phosphate/autologous iliac crest bone composites for segmental ulnar defects in rabbits.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Jun;19(6):2485-92. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3383-8. Epub 2008 Feb 6. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008. PMID: 18253814
-
Effect of Porosity of Alumina and Zirconia Ceramics toward Pre-Osteoblast Response.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Oct 28;3:175. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00175. eCollection 2015. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015. PMID: 26579516 Free PMC article.
-
Overcoming barriers confronting application of protein therapeutics in bone fracture healing.Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021 Jun;11(3):842-865. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00829-x. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 32783153 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources