MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant and nonpregnant patients
- PMID: 17495289
- DOI: 10.1148/rg.273065116
MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant and nonpregnant patients
Abstract
The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain is increasing, particularly in those circumstances where computed tomography (CT) is not desirable (eg, pregnancy, allergy to iodinated contrast material). Although ultrasonography (US) is considered the imaging study of choice for evaluation of abdominal pain in pregnant patients, MR imaging is a valuable adjunct to US in evaluation of pregnant patients with acute right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain who have inconclusive US results. MR imaging is also frequently used in patients with renal failure, in whom the use of iodinated contrast material is contraindicated, as well as in cases where CT results are inconclusive. In patients with acute RLQ pain, the breadth of abnormalities visible at MR imaging is very broad, with pathologic conditions potentially originating from multiple organ systems, but most commonly from the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems. MR imaging is an excellent imaging modality for evaluation of RLQ pain and should be strongly considered in those patients in whom use of iodinated contrast media or radiation is not desirable.
(c) RSNA, 2007.
Similar articles
-
Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging--initial experience.Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):445-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2341032002. Epub 2004 Dec 10. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 15591434
-
Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010 Oct;31(5):433-41. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.08.003. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010. PMID: 20974361 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal pain during pregnancy.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec;17(6):409-16. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180417d2d. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006. PMID: 17417088 Review.
-
MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy.Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):891-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2383050146. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16505393
-
MR imaging of the acute abdomen and pelvis: acute appendicitis and beyond.Radiographics. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):1419-31. doi: 10.1148/rg.275065021. Radiographics. 2007. PMID: 17848700 Review.
Cited by
-
The protective effect of cilostazol on experimental ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats ovaries on in vitro fertilization outcomes.Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 23;19(3):236-241. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.29599. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 36149305 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease.Insights Imaging. 2019 Dec 20;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0807-6. Insights Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31858287 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI.Emerg Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(2):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3. Emerg Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24078282 Review.
-
Effect of metformin and detorsion treatment on serum anti-Müllerian hormonelevels and ovarian histopathology in a rat ovarian torsion model.Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 9;50(2):455-463. doi: 10.3906/sag-1803-196. Turk J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 31999406 Free PMC article.
-
Single institution and statewide performance of ultrasound in diagnosing appendicitis in pregnancy.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Apr;28(6):727-33. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.932344. Epub 2014 Jul 2. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. PMID: 24913357 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical