SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment
- PMID: 17495582
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5
SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment
Abstract
Study design: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
Objectives: To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions.
Summary and background data: Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature.
Methods: Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement).
Results: SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P < 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery.
Conclusion: While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery).
Similar articles
-
Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2905-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b84ae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 18246016
-
Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 18. Spine J. 2008. PMID: 17669690
-
MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.004. Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16413443
-
[Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].Neurocirugia (Astur). 2007 Oct;18(5):406-13. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2007. PMID: 18008014 Review. Spanish.
-
Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Jun;76(318):5-47. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16175972 Review.
Cited by
-
Economics of Cervical Disc Replacement.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S67-S72. doi: 10.14444/7093. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32994308 Free PMC article.
-
New challenges for intervertebral disc treatment using regenerative medicine.Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010 Feb;16(1):147-58. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0451. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010. PMID: 19903086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: projected cost effectiveness at 5-year follow-up.Ochsner J. 2014 Spring;14(1):14-22. Ochsner J. 2014. PMID: 24688328 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of economic evaluation on quality management in spine surgery.Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):338-47. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0939-3. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19337760 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988. Neurosurgery. 2015. PMID: 26291338 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources