Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr 1;119(4):1223-1232.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000254400.29522.1c.

Analysis of salvage treatments following the failure of free flap transfer caused by vascular thrombosis in reconstruction for head and neck cancer

Affiliations

Analysis of salvage treatments following the failure of free flap transfer caused by vascular thrombosis in reconstruction for head and neck cancer

Mutsumi Okazaki et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Few authors have reported the subsequent treatment for patients in whom free tissue transfers in the head and neck have failed as a result of vascular thrombosis.

Methods: Between 1993 and May of 2005, 502 free flaps were transferred after head and neck cancer ablation in the authors' hospital, 19 of which resulted in total necrosis caused by vascular thrombosis. The authors categorized these 19 cases into four groups and analyzed the salvage treatment.

Results: For failed free jejunal transfer, early initiation of oral intake was obtained when another free jejunum was transferred. For failed free soft-tissue transfer for intraoral defects, reconstruction with common free (first choice) or pedicled flaps was used: a voluminous musculocutaneous flap for extensive defects, forearm flap or pedicled pectoralis major flap for intermediate defects, and direct closure for small defects of the oral floor. For failed secondary soft-tissue transfer to improve a certain function, salvage flap transfer was not chosen in the acute setting. For failed secondary maxillary reconstruction, simple reconstruction using the rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap combined with costal cartilage achieved stable results. The overall success rate of the repeated free flap was 89 percent (eight of nine patients).

Conclusions: When a free flap is judged unsalvageable, surgeons should determine subsequent treatments, considering the success rate as one of the most important factors. The authors believe that simple reconstruction using a common free flap is the first choice in most cases. When regional or general conditions do not permit further free flap transfer or when defects are comparatively small, reconstruction with a pedicled flap or direct closure of the defect may be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Urken, M. L., Weinberg, H., Buchbinder, D., et al. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 120: 633, 1994.
    1. Kroll, S. S., Schusterman, M. A., Reece, G. P., et al. Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 98: 459, 1996.
    1. Nakatsuka, T., Harii, K., Asato, H., et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 19: 363, 2003.
    1. Nahabedian, M. Y., Singh, N., Deune, E. G., et al. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Ann. Plast. Surg 52: 148, 2004.
    1. Shaw, W. Microvascular free flaps. Clin. Plast. Surg. 10: 3, 1983.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources