Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits
- PMID: 17496638
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153f8
Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits
Abstract
Background: The advent of universal neonatal hearing screening in some countries and the availability of screening programs for at-risk infants in other countries has facilitated earlier referral, diagnosis, and intervention for infants with hearing loss. Improvements in device technology, two decades of pediatric clinical experience, a growing recognition of the efficacy of cochlear implants for young children, and the recent change in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's age criteria to include children as young as 12 mo has led to increasing numbers of young children receiving cochlear implants. Evidence to support provision for infants younger than 12 mo is extrapolated from physiological studies, studies of children using hearing aids, and studies of children older than 12 mo of age with implants. To date, however, there are few published research findings regarding communication development in children between 6 and 12 mo of age who receive implants. The current study hypothesized that earlier implantation would lead to increased rates of language acquisition as the children were still in the critical period for their development.
Method: A retrospective review was completed for 19 infants (mean age at implantation, 0.88 yr; range, 0.61-1.07, SD 0.15) and 87 toddlers (mean age at implantation, 1.60 yr; range, 1.13-2.00, SD 0.24) who received the multichannel implant in Melbourne, Australia. Preimplantation audiological assessments for these children included aided and unaided audiograms, auditory brain stem response, auditory steady state response (ASSR), and otoacoustic emission and indicated profound to total bilateral hearing loss in all cases. Communication assessment included completion of the Rossetti Infant-Toddler Language Scale and educational psychologists' cognitive and motor assessment. Computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical records for all cases were reviewed. Postimplantation language assessments were reported in terms of the rate of growth over time on the language comprehension and language expression subscales of the Rossetti Infant-Toddler Language Scale.
Results: Results demonstrated that cochlear implantation may be performed safely in very young children with excellent language outcomes. The mean rates of receptive (1.12) and expressive (1.01) language growth for children receiving implants before the age of 12 mo were significantly greater than the rates achieved by children receiving implants between 12 and 24 mo, and matched growth rates achieved by normally hearing peers. These preliminary results support the provision of cochlear implants for children younger than 12 mo of age within experienced pediatric implantation centers.
Similar articles
-
Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age.Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 16672797 Free PMC article.
-
Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age.Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):443-50. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182814d2c. Otol Neurotol. 2013. PMID: 23442570
-
An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):492-511. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816c409f. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18382374 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Why and How.Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211031751. doi: 10.1177/23312165211031751. Trends Hear. 2021. PMID: 34281434 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Jun;65(3):325-39. Minerva Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23685383 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
[Cochlear implants in children and adolescents].HNO. 2013 May;61(5):388-98. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2699-y. HNO. 2013. PMID: 23649525 German.
-
The roles of language and executive function in Mandarin-speaking children's theory of mind development.Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1354207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354207. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38933593 Free PMC article.
-
Bhopal Technique of Cochlear Implantation: A Surgical Review of 50 Cases.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):375-380. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01889-8. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32728549 Free PMC article.
-
Speech perception in congenitally deaf children receiving cochlear implants in the first year of life.Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1254-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2f475. Otol Neurotol. 2010. PMID: 20814343 Free PMC article.
-
Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin.Front Neurosci. 2014 Sep 9;8:282. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00282. eCollection 2014. Front Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25249932 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical