More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users
- PMID: 17496654
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180315117
More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users
Abstract
Objective: Preliminary studies show that bilateral cochlear implantation improves speech-recognition ability in many subjects; however, the magnitude of this improvement has been variable. The objective of our research was to explore means to better differentiate the binaural benefit that many patients who receive bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) describe.
Hypothesis: Binaural improvements in speech-perception performance will be consistently evident across patients when they are tested in more challenging listening situations.
Design: This was a prospective clinical study. Speech-perception performance was compared between the unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant conditions. Because the purpose was to investigate testing parameters that would demonstrate binaural benefit, word- and sentence-recognition tests were administered under several stimulation conditions: with and without noise and at three presentation levels. In addition, all subjects completed the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit as a measure of subjective benefit. Subjects were adult cochlear implant recipients. Three device manufacturers were represented (Advanced Bionics Corporation, Cochlear Americas, and the Med-El Corporation); three patients received simultaneous implantation, and the other four patients received sequential CIs. The setting was a comprehensive cochlear implant program/tertiary referral center. The main outcomes measures were speech-recognition scores in percent correct, mean score difference for unilateral versus bilateral conditions, and subjective benefit scores.
Results: The most significant improvements in binaural cochlear implant use were found when subjects were tested with sentence material presented at 60 dB SPL with a +8 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Six of seven subjects showed significant binaural improvement, with a mean improvement score of 12.43% (SD = 5.32). All subjects preferred the binaural listening condition. Measured improvements in quality of life were seen.
Conclusions: Preliminary study findings suggest that significant cochlear implant binaural benefit in speech perception may be observed when testing in more difficult listening situations (i.e., lower presentation levels and in noise). According to the outcome of our study, testing the binaural benefit of CIs requires consideration of suitable test materials and stimulation parameters.
Similar articles
-
Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00016. Otol Neurotol. 2004. PMID: 15547426 Clinical Trial.
-
Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):649-57. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000281807.89938.60. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17712290
-
Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Feb;77(2):162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 6. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23137855
-
Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.Trends Amplif. 2007 Sep;11(3):161-92. doi: 10.1177/1084713807304357. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 17709573 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Binaural squelch and head shadow effects in children with unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015 Oct;35(5):343-9. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-497. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015. PMID: 26824917 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):554-65. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.580785. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Int J Audiol. 2011. PMID: 21696329 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 28;13:859722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859722. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35572246 Free PMC article.
-
Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(1):57-71. doi: 10.1159/000355700. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Audiol Neurootol. 2014. PMID: 24356514 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):457-70. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d5d9bf. Ear Hear. 2010. PMID: 20418771 Free PMC article.
-
Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Apr;16(2):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0503-7. Epub 2015 Jan 13. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25582430 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous