Pain experience during chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a preliminary study
- PMID: 17499418
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.03.020
Pain experience during chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a preliminary study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the maternal perception of pain before and after amniocentesis (AC) or transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS).
Study design: Three hundred women were divided into groups of 100 participants destined to undergo three different fetal sampling procedures: amniocentesis (group 1), transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) with a 19 gauge Blache needle (group 2) and transabdominal CVS with a 20 gauge needle (group 3). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify the patient's pre-sampling expected pain level and the real pain level was measured immediately after the sampling procedure. The factors liable to influence the VAS score after the sampling procedure were studied by single and multivariate analysis and concerned either the sampling procedure or patient demographic data.
Results: The VAS scores obtained before the procedure were not significantly different for the three sampling groups. When performed with a 19 gauge Blache needle TA-CVS is significantly more painful than the other sampling procedures (p=0.0002): VAS score of 3.62 (group 2), 2.49 (group 3) and 2.68 (group 1) for CVS with 20 gauge needle and amniocentesis. Multivariate analysis identified a group of patients for which the perception of pain induced by sampling was higher compared to the other patients: nulliparous patients, having undergone 19 gauge Blache needle CVS, with a high pre-sampling VAS score.
Conclusion: Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling with a 19 gauge Blache needle seems to be the most painful sampling procedure. We question the need to use a 19 gauge needle as acceptable results are obtained with a 20 gauge needle.
Similar articles
-
How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling?Prenat Diagn. 2006 Jan;26(1):35-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.1323. Prenat Diagn. 2006. PMID: 16378331
-
Pain associated with chorionic villus sampling: transabdominal vs transcervical approach.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):400.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.064. Epub 2009 Aug 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19683693
-
[Randomized comparison of transabdominal, transcervical chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis].Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 May 10;155(19):1446-56. Ugeskr Laeger. 1993. PMID: 8316971 Clinical Trial. Danish.
-
Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in 2008.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;20(2):164-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f7321f. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18388817 Review.
-
Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 2005.Semin Perinatol. 2005 Aug;29(4):215-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2005.06.004. Semin Perinatol. 2005. PMID: 16104671 Review.
Cited by
-
Maternal anxiety and its correlation with pain experience during chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis.J Pain Res. 2017 Mar 13;10:591-600. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S128300. eCollection 2017. J Pain Res. 2017. PMID: 28331361 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional 22- and 20-gauge needle for second trimester amniocentesis: A comparison of short term outcomes.Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;13(1):27-30. doi: 10.4274/tjod.74875. Epub 2016 Mar 10. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 28913085 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical