Calculations of protein-ligand binding entropy of relative and overall molecular motions
- PMID: 17503189
- DOI: 10.1007/s10822-007-9116-0
Calculations of protein-ligand binding entropy of relative and overall molecular motions
Abstract
In the context of virtual database screening, calculations of protein-ligand binding entropy of relative and overall molecular motions are challenging, owing to the inherent structural complexity of the ligand binding well in the energy landscape of protein-ligand interactions and computing time limitations. We describe a fast statistical thermodynamic method for estimation the binding entropy to address the challenges. The method is based on the integration of the configurational integral over clusters obtained from multiple docked positions. We apply the method in conjunction with 11 popular scoring functions (AutoDock, ChemScore, DrugScore, D-Score, F-Score, G-Score, LigScore, LUDI, PLP, PMF, X-Score) to evaluate the binding entropy of 100 protein-ligand complexes. The averaged values of binding entropy contribution vary from 6.2 to 9.1 kcal/mol, showing good agreement with literature. We calculate positional sizes and the angular volume of the native ligand wells. The averaged geometric mean of positional sizes in principal directions varies from 0.8 to 1.4 A. The calculated range of angular volumes is 3.3-11.8 rad(2). Then we demonstrate that the averaged six-dimensional volume of the native well is larger than the volume of the most populated non-native well in energy landscapes described by all of 11 scoring functions.
Similar articles
-
Role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions.J Comput Chem. 2007 Jun;28(8):1364-72. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20580. J Comput Chem. 2007. PMID: 17342720
-
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303. doi: 10.1021/jm0203783. J Med Chem. 2003. PMID: 12773034
-
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004. PMID: 15554682
-
Free energy calculations of protein-ligand interactions.Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011 Aug;15(4):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jun 22. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011. PMID: 21684797 Review.
-
Modeling loop entropy.Methods Enzymol. 2011;487:99-132. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00004-4. Methods Enzymol. 2011. PMID: 21187223 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Path-integral method for predicting relative binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Apr 1;131(12):4521-8. doi: 10.1021/ja807460s. J Am Chem Soc. 2009. PMID: 19275144 Free PMC article.
-
Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1934-45. doi: 10.1021/ci400040d. Epub 2013 Apr 15. J Chem Inf Model. 2013. PMID: 23530568 Free PMC article.
-
Toward a molecular understanding of the interaction of dual specificity phosphatases with substrates: insights from structure-based modeling and high throughput screening.Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(25):2536-44. doi: 10.2174/092986708785909003. Curr Med Chem. 2008. PMID: 18855677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current progress in Structure-Based Rational Drug Design marks a new mindset in drug discovery.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2013 Apr 2;5:e201302011. doi: 10.5936/csbj.201302011. eCollection 2013. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2013. PMID: 24688704 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations.Biochemistry. 2011 Jul 19;50(28):6157-69. doi: 10.1021/bi2004558. Epub 2011 Jun 22. Biochemistry. 2011. PMID: 21678954 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous