Genetics, environment, and their interaction determine efficacy of chemical defense in trembling aspen
- PMID: 17503600
- DOI: 10.1890/06-0064
Genetics, environment, and their interaction determine efficacy of chemical defense in trembling aspen
Abstract
Optimal defense theories suggest that a trade-off between defense costs and benefits maintains genetic variation within plant populations. This study assessed the independent and interactive effects of genetic- and environment-based variation in aspen leaf chemistry on insect performance, preference, and defoliation. Gypsy moth larvae were released into screenhouses containing eight aspen genotypes growing with high and low levels of nutrient availability. Plant chemistry, defoliation, and larval growth rates varied in response to genotype, nutrient availability, and their interaction. Total phenolic glycoside concentrations were inversely correlated with patterns of larval preference and were the best predictor of larval performance and defoliation among genotypes. Low-nutrient trees were less heavily defoliated and afforded decreased larval growth rates compared with high-nutrient trees. Nutrient availability mediated the defense benefits of phenolic glycosides, as plant chemistry explained significantly less variation in defoliation in low- compared with high-nutrient trees (7% vs. 44% of variation explained). These results suggest that spatial and temporal variation in resource availability may influence the relative magnitude of defense benefits in plants. Environmental mediation of the defense costs and benefits likely leads to diversifying selection and may maintain genetic polymorphisms in chemical defense traits in plant populations.
Similar articles
-
Effects of genotype, nutrient availability, and defoliation on aspen phytochemistry and insect performance.J Chem Ecol. 2001 Jul;27(7):1289-313. doi: 10.1023/a:1010352307301. J Chem Ecol. 2001. PMID: 11504029
-
Genotype and environment determine allocation to and costs of resistance in quaking aspen.Oecologia. 2006 Jun;148(2):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0373-8. Epub 2006 Feb 9. Oecologia. 2006. PMID: 16468055
-
Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.Oecologia. 2004 Mar;139(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1481-3. Epub 2004 Jan 23. Oecologia. 2004. PMID: 14740291
-
Clonal Saplings of Trembling Aspen Do Not Coordinate Defense Induction.J Chem Ecol. 2018 Nov;44(11):1045-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10886-018-1006-5. Epub 2018 Aug 15. J Chem Ecol. 2018. PMID: 30109458
-
Influence of Genotype, Environment, and Gypsy Moth Herbivory on Local and Systemic Chemical Defenses in Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides).J Chem Ecol. 2015 Jul;41(7):651-61. doi: 10.1007/s10886-015-0600-z. Epub 2015 Jun 23. J Chem Ecol. 2015. PMID: 26099738
Cited by
-
Chemical diversity among populations of Mikania micrantha: geographic mosaic structure and herbivory.Oecologia. 2014 Jan;174(1):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2748-y. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Oecologia. 2014. PMID: 23942983
-
Leaf chemical defences and insect herbivory in oak: accounting for canopy position unravels marked genetic relatedness effects.Ann Bot. 2020 Oct 6;126(5):865-872. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa101. Ann Bot. 2020. PMID: 32463869 Free PMC article.
-
Extrafloral nectaries in aspen (Populus tremuloides): heritable genetic variation and herbivore-induced expression.Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1337-46. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm220. Ann Bot. 2007. PMID: 17951361 Free PMC article.
-
Why are not all chilies hot? A trade-off limits pungency.Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):2012-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2091. Epub 2011 Dec 21. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22189403 Free PMC article.
-
Browse quality in quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides): effects of genotype, nutrients, defoliation, and coppicing.J Chem Ecol. 2007 May;33(5):1049-64. doi: 10.1007/s10886-007-9281-6. Epub 2007 Apr 3. J Chem Ecol. 2007. PMID: 17404817