Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May 15:8:29.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-29.

General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study

Affiliations

General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study

Sharon M Madigan et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Complex medical treatment is moving from hospital to primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) are increasingly asked to undertake new roles. There are now an estimated 19,500 patients being fed in the UK in the community on enteral tube feeding using a variety of different feeding tubes (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), Jejunostomy, or nasogastric (NG). The majority of patients are over the age of 65 years when they had artificial feeding initiated and mainly because of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to explore GPs knowledge, attitudes and skills relating to enteral feeding in the community.

Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with a convenience sample of GPs in Northern Ireland.

Results: Twenty-three GPs in three health boards in Northern Ireland participated in the study. Most found dealing with enteral feeding to be a predominantly negative experience. They had little involvement in patient selection for the procedure and poor or no discharge information. GPs felt inadequately trained, there was poor communication between primary and secondary care and little support. There was anger and frustration among GPs about lack of resources (funding and training), and the perception that primary care was used as a dumping ground.

Conclusion: Moving complex medical treatment from secondary to primary care has major implications for GPs who should be included in the patient selection process, have adequate discharge information about their patients, be adequately resourced and have appropriate support and training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interview Schedule with GPs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glencorse C, Meadows N, Holden C. Trends in artificial nutrition support in the UK between 1996–2002. A report by the British Artificial Nutrition Survey (BANS) A committee of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2003.
    1. Roche V. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: clinical care of PEG tubes in older adults. Geriatrics. 2003;58:22–26. - PubMed
    1. Heaney A, Tham T. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: attitudes of general practitioners and how management may be improved. British Journal of General Practice. 2001;51:128–129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McNamara EP, Flood P, Kennedy NP. Enteral tube feeding in the community: survey of adult patients discharged from a Dublin hospital. Clinical Nutrition. 2000;19:15–22. doi: 10.1054/clnu.1999.0045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grande GE. Difficulties of symptom control and general practitioners knowledge of patients symptoms. Palliative Medicine. 1997;11:399–406. - PubMed

Publication types