Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;57(538):359-63.

Influenza vaccination in patients with asthma: why is the uptake so low?

Affiliations

Influenza vaccination in patients with asthma: why is the uptake so low?

Helen Keenan et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 May.

Abstract

Background: Patients with asthma are particularly susceptible to serious complications from influenza. The Chief Medical Officer recommends annual influenza vaccination for adult patients with asthma. The uptake of influenza vaccination by patients with asthma is only 40% and, unlike other high-risk groups, has failed to increase in recent years.

Aim: To investigate the contribution of sociodemographic factors, asthma morbidity, and health beliefs to influenza vaccination uptake in patients with asthma.

Design of study: Cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Setting: Single urban British general practice, Exeter, UK.

Method: A questionnaire survey was sent to adult patients with asthma. Participants were aged 16-65 years, were receiving beta(2) agonists and inhaled steroids, and had been invited for influenza vaccination in September 2003. Data were examined using univariate analysis and logistic regression.

Results: A total of 136/204 (66.7%) patients responded to the survey. Influenza vaccination uptake in the study population was 40%. Younger patients were less likely to have undergone vaccination than older patients. There was no difference in vaccination uptake rates between groups of patients defined by other sociodemographic factors. Asthma morbidity was similar in vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups of patients. Vaccinated individuals had a greater belief in the efficacy of the vaccination and medical advice regarding the vaccination, and felt more susceptible to influenza and its complications when compared with non-vaccinated individuals. A fear of side-effects was associated with declining the invitation for vaccination. These health beliefs were the only independent predictors of uptake of influenza vaccination among this group of patients with asthma.

Conclusion: Improving vaccination uptake in patients with asthma is unlikely unless individual health beliefs are taken into account.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Health. Influenza immunisation. CM0's Update. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.
    1. Cates CJ, Jefferson TO, Bara AI, Rowe BH. Vaccines for preventing influenza in people with asthma. In: Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2004. - PubMed
    1. Hak E, Buskens E, van Essen GA. Clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in persons younger than 65 years with high-risk medical conditions: the PRISMA study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:274–280. - PubMed
    1. Watkins J. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination policy at targeting patients at high risk of complications during winter 1994–5: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1997;315:1069–1070. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis-Parmar H, McCann R. Achieving national influenza vaccine targets — an investigation of the factors affecting influenza vaccine uptake in older people and people with diabetes. Commun Dis Public Health. 2002;5:119–126. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances