The neural bases of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation
- PMID: 17504782
- DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm053
The neural bases of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation
Abstract
The lexical effect is a phenomenon whereby lexical information influences the perception of the phonetic category boundary for stimuli from word-nonword continua. At issue is whether this effect is due to "top-down" influence of upper levels of processing on perceptual processing, or instead is due to decision-stage processes. In this study, brain activity was monitored using functional magnetic resonance imaging as subjects performed a phonetic categorization task on items taken from 2 continua in which one end of the continuum was a real word and the other was not (gift-kift and giss-kiss). If the lexical effect has a perceptual basis, modulation of activation should be seen as a function of the lexical effect in areas such as the superior temporal gyri (STG) which have previously been implicated in perceptual processing. In contrast, if the effect is purely due to decision-related factors, such modulation would be expected only in areas which have been linked to executive processes, such as frontal and midline structures. Modulation of activation as a function of the lexically biased shift in phonetic category boundary was observed in the STG bilaterally as well as in frontal and midline structures. This activation pattern suggests that the lexical effect has at minimum a perceptual component, in addition to an executive decision-related component. These results challenge the view that lexical effects on phonetic boundary placement are due solely to postperceptual, decision-stage processes, and support those models of language processing which allow for higher-level lexical information to directly influence the perception of incoming speech.
Similar articles
-
The role of lexical status on the phonetic categorization of speech in aphasia.Brain Lang. 1994 Feb;46(2):181-97. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1011. Brain Lang. 1994. PMID: 8137141
-
The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure.J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Sep;17(9):1353-66. doi: 10.1162/0898929054985473. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16197689
-
Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;15(3):372-93. doi: 10.1162/089892903321593108. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 12729490
-
Approach to functional magnetic resonance imaging of language based on models of language organization.Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2001 May;11(2):343-53, x. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2001. PMID: 11489743 Review.
-
Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: how to disentangle lexical and prosodic information?Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:295-302. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56016-9. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17015087 Review.
Cited by
-
Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise.Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105661. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105661. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Cognition. 2024. PMID: 37944313 Free PMC article.
-
Lexical Influences on Categorical Speech Perception Are Driven by a Temporoparietal Circuit.J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr 1;33(5):840-852. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01678. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34449838 Free PMC article.
-
Simple Recurrent Networks are Interactive.Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1032-1040. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02608-y. Epub 2024 Nov 13. Psychon Bull Rev. 2025. PMID: 39537950 Review.
-
What does the right hemisphere know about phoneme categories?J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):552-69. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21495. Epub 2010 Mar 29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20350179 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech.Front Neurosci. 2020 Feb 27;14:153. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00153. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32180700 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources