High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla
- PMID: 17507821
- DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000263183.66407.69
High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla
Abstract
Introduction: Recent developments in hard- and software help to significantly increase image quality of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Parallel acquisition techniques (PAT) help to increase spatial resolution and to decrease acquisition time but also suffer from a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The movement to higher field strength and the use of dedicated angiography coils can further increase spatial resolution while decreasing acquisition times at the same SNR as it is known from contemporary exams. The goal of our study was to compare the image quality of MRA datasets acquired with a standard matrix coil in comparison to MRA datasets acquired with a dedicated peripheral angio matrix coil and higher factors of parallel imaging.
Materials and methods: Before the first volunteer examination, unaccelerated phantom measurements were performed with the different coils. After institutional review board approval, 15 healthy volunteers underwent MRA of the lower extremity on a 32 channel 3.0 Tesla MR System. In 5 of them MRA of the calves was performed with a PAT acceleration factor of 2 and a standard body-matrix surface coil placed at the legs. Ten volunteers underwent MRA of the calves with a dedicated 36-element angiography matrix coil: 5 with a PAT acceleration of 3 and 5 with a PAT acceleration factor of 4, respectively. The acquired volume and acquisition time was approximately the same in all examinations, only the spatial resolution was increased with the acceleration factor. The acquisition time per voxel was calculated. Image quality was rated independently by 2 readers in terms of vessel conspicuity, venous overlay, and occurrence of artifacts. The inter-reader agreement was calculated by the kappa-statistics. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios from the different examinations were evaluated.
Results: All 15 volunteers completed the examination, no adverse events occurred. None of the examinations showed venous overlay; 70% of the examinations showed an excellent vessel conspicuity, whereas in 50% of the examinations artifacts occurred. All of these artifacts were judged as none disturbing. Inter-reader agreement was good with kappa values ranging between 0.65 and 0.74. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios did not show significant differences.
Conclusion: Implementation of a dedicated coil for peripheral MRA at 3.0 Tesla helps to increase spatial resolution and to decrease acquisition time while the image quality could be kept equal. Venous overlay can be effectively avoided despite the use of high-resolution scans.
Similar articles
-
High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.Invest Radiol. 2006 Apr;41(4):391-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000197978.88991.17. Invest Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16523022
-
3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent.Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):392-8. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000261937.77365.6a. Invest Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17507810
-
High spatial resolution whole-body MR angiography featuring parallel imaging: initial experience.Rofo. 2004 Feb;176(2):163-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817623. Rofo. 2004. PMID: 14872368
-
Extracranial carotid MR imaging at 3T.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):109-21. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2005.12.003. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006. PMID: 16530639 Review.
-
Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009 Feb;17(1):29-46. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2008.12.005. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009. PMID: 19364598 Review.
Cited by
-
[Screening in cardiovascular diseases].Radiologe. 2008 Jan;48(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s00117-007-1607-4. Radiologe. 2008. PMID: 18210053 Review. German.
-
Whole-Body MRA.Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):1925-36. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0817-5. Epub 2008 May 20. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18491112 Review.
-
Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul;42(1):3-22. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24880. Epub 2015 Jun 1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26032598 Free PMC article.
-
"Number needed to read"--how to facilitate clinical trials in MR-angiography.Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):1034-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1993-2. Epub 2010 Oct 23. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20972569 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance: Why and when?World J Radiol. 2010 Jan 28;2(1):37-40. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i1.37. World J Radiol. 2010. PMID: 21160738 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources