Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design
- PMID: 17508624
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design
Abstract
Objective: To assess the plaque removing efficacy and safety of a novel manual toothbrush (Oral-B Pulsar-PUL) compared to leading manual and battery toothbrushes.
Methodology: Three clinical studies were conducted, each having a randomized, examiner-blind, crossover design. Study 1 compared PUL to a newly marketed manual toothbrush, Colgate 360 degrees (COL), Study 2 compared PUL to the Oral-B Advantage Plus (AP) and Oral-B CrossAction (CA) manual toothbrushes, and Study 3 compared PUL to two battery toothbrushes, Oral-B CrossAction Power (CAP) and Crest SpinBrush Pro (SBP). Before each brushing visit, subjects refrained from all oral hygiene procedures for 23-25 hours, received an oral tissue examination, and pre-brushing plaque was scored based on the Rustogi et. al, odified Navy Plaque Index. After subjects brushed with the assigned toothbrush in their usual manner for one minute, oral tissues were then re-examined and post-brushing plaque scores recorded. Subjects with pre-brushing whole mouth mean plaque scores > or = 0.6 continued in the study after the first visit. Following a brief washout period between additional visits, the above procedures were repeated in the remaining treatment periods. The examiners who made all clinical measurements were blinded to the treatment sequence.
Results: All toothbrushes significantly (p = 0.0001) reduced plaque levels from all areas after a single brushing. Study 1 showed a significant difference for PUL in all areas, whole mouth, margin, and approximal (p < 0.05) compared to COL. In Study 2, PUL removed significantly more whole mouth (p < 0.01) and approximal plaque (p < 0.005) than AP as scored by two examiners, but did not show a significant advantage versus CA. In Study 3, PUL removed significantly more plaque than CAP and SBP for whole mouth (both p = 0.0001), marginal (both p = 0.0001), and approximal (p < 0.005, p = 0.0001, respectively) areas. All toothbrushes were found to be safe with no evidence of hard or soft tissue trauma.
Conclusion: The new Oral-B Pulsar toothbrush removed significantly more plaque than Colgate 360 and Oral-B Advantage Plus. Additionally, Pulsar removed significantly more plaque than two battery brushes, Oral-B CrossAction Power and Crest SpinBrush Pro.
Similar articles
-
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006. PMID: 17091134 Clinical Trial.
-
Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):191-7. J Clin Dent. 2002. PMID: 12518488 Clinical Trial.
-
Plaque removal efficacy and safety of the next generation of manual toothbrush with angled bristle technology: results from three comparative clinical studies.Am J Dent. 2005 Feb;18(1):3-7. Am J Dent. 2005. PMID: 15810473 Clinical Trial.
-
The clinical effectiveness of a novel power toothbrush and its impact on oral health.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002 May 15;3(2):1-10. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002. PMID: 12167903 Review.
-
Plaque removal efficacy of oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes: review of six comparative clinical trials.Am J Dent. 2013 Apr;26(2):68-74. Am J Dent. 2013. PMID: 24073528 Review.
Cited by
-
A prospective case-control study to evaluate oral health status before and after intervention using different dental aids in children with visual impairment.J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):242-249. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_20. Epub 2021 May 3. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021. PMID: 34158692 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of an electric toothbrush on plaque control compared to two manual toothbrushes.Int Dent J. 2011 Jun;61(3):131-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00029.x. Int Dent J. 2011. PMID: 21692783 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Three types of Tooth Brushes on Plaque and Gingival Indices: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Open Dent J. 2017 Feb 28;11:126-132. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010126. eCollection 2017. Open Dent J. 2017. PMID: 28357006 Free PMC article.
-
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24934383 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the toothbrush tuft arrangement and bristle stiffness on the abrasive dentin wear.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04884-x. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35039599 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous